Sanaullah’s remarks

Published September 25, 2023

THE hypocrisy of our democratic leadership is a gift that keeps giving. Last week, the president of the PML-N in Punjab, Rana Sanaullah, berated the former army chief, retired Gen Qamar Bajwa, as a “national criminal” who had committed a “crime bigger than a murder offence”. He was echoing a statement made by his party’s supreme leader, Nawaz Sharif, who has on several occasions held Mr Bajwa directly responsible for his ouster and now wishes for him to be held to account for his ‘crimes’. Just a day later, however, Mr Sanaullah all but confirmed a long-held suspicion that his party had also colluded with Gen Bajwa in its efforts to remove the PTI from power. Mr Sanaullah had been asked during a TV interview why the PML-N supported a three-year extension for Gen Bajwa in 2019, which he described as a ‘strategic move’. “It would seem that the consequences of that decision allowed us to achieve our goal,” Mr Sanaullah said — the goal being to lower the “intensity” with which the “fitna” and “fasaad” of the PTI was prevailing over the country at the time. “Sometimes things seem a certain way, but their implied effects [sic] are something else,” the PML-N leader concluded.

Was it hubris that led Mr Sanaullah to implicate the PML-N and the military in what he has made out to be a conspiracy, sealed with a quid pro quo deal, to unseat the PTI government? Or did he wish to imply that the PML-N had, with its political guile, ‘used’ the former army chief to achieve its own political goals? Considering the number of times former PM Shehbaz Sharif publicly thanked and congratulated Gen Bajwa for his services while he was in office, it is difficult to reconcile the PML-N’s new stance with its leaders’ effervescent gratitude while in power. Rank hypocrisy or realpolitik? Time will tell. One can also not help but recall how both Gen Bajwa and ISPR repeatedly assured the public of their ‘neutrality’ amidst the political chaos that broke out in 2022. The main beneficiary of the PTI’s downfall now suggests that was not the case. Can the PTI chief be faulted, then, for turning his ire on that institution’s leadership if he had correctly identified the role they had played? Perhaps such questions are best left for another time.

Published in Dawn, September 25th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

IHK resolution
Updated 08 Nov, 2024

IHK resolution

If the BJP administration were to listen to Kashmiris, it could pave the way for the resumption of the political process in IHK.
Climate realities
08 Nov, 2024

Climate realities

THE Air Quality Index in Lahore once again shot past the 1,000-level mark on Wednesday morning, registering at an...
Rule by fear
08 Nov, 2024

Rule by fear

THE abduction of an opposition MNA, as claimed by PTI, is yet another grim episode in Pakistan’s ongoing crisis of...
Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...