Brutalising society

Published October 2, 2023

THE Senate Standing Committee on Interior passed a bill last week with a majority vote that favoured the public hangings of rapists — a move that was condemned by the PPP as well as the interior and foreign affairs ministries. Proposed by a Jamaat-i-Islami senator, the bill seeks to amend certain sections of the Pakistan Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code to legalise public executions.

This is a disturbing development. Since the rape and murder of young Zainab Ansari in 2018, the call for public hangings has intensified. The idea has been encouraged by many well-known figures, with Imran Khan endorsing it when he was prime minister. The parties and organisations criticising the vote rightly point out that executions do not act as deterrents, and that carrying out capital punishment in city squares is going to further brutalise a society already steeped in violence. Those who support public executions are allowing their emotions to gain the upper hand — or playing to the gallery. The reality is that executions — including public ones — do not improve the criminal justice system. In this context, the PPP’s Sherry Rehman was right to indicate that crime, even after former military dictator Ziaul Haq’s introduction of punishments administered in view of the public, did not come down and, in fact, increased “barbarism and violence”. The anger at the growing violence and sexual crimes against women is understandable. But it should find an outlet in better funding for police, improved criminal investigations and solid training for officers investigating rape. Instead, public emotions are whipped up by calling for executions when the nation is overcome by horror. This paper has consistently criticised the death penalty, and the fact that many of our lawmakers now want to implement this sentence in city squares is extremely worrying. Mr Khan once remarked that he would legalise the public hanging of rapists, but that the international community would not view it kindly as it goes against their human rights principles. Such statements are not focused on justice, but on the idea of immediate revenge, which means they do not yield any positive result in the long term. Our lawmakers should look at the flaws in our justice system when deliberating on such important matters, and not let emotions or the need to appease the public get in their way.

Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Paying the price
18 Apr, 2025

Paying the price

THE freak hailstorm that swept across northern Pakistan on Wednesday, claiming lives and causing destruction,...
Political solution
18 Apr, 2025

Political solution

THOUGH the BNP-M may have ended its 20-day protest sit-in outside Quetta on Wednesday, the core issues affecting...
Grave desecration
18 Apr, 2025

Grave desecration

THE desecration of 85 Muslim graves at a cemetery in Hertfordshire in the UK is a distressing act that deserves the...
Double-edged sword
Updated 17 Apr, 2025

Double-edged sword

While remittances have provided critical support to current account, they have also been a double-edged sword.
Besieged people
17 Apr, 2025

Besieged people

DESPITE all the talk about becoming a ‘hard’ state, Pakistan is still looking incredibly soft when it comes to...
Deadly zealotry
Updated 17 Apr, 2025

Deadly zealotry

Murdering people and attacking firms is indefensible and only besmirches the Palestinian cause.