LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday issued notices to the caretaker federal government, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and the principal secretary to the president on a petition seeking an order for holding of general election in the country within 90 days of the National Assembly dissolution.

At the outset of hearing, Justice Chaudhry Abdul Aziz asked the petitioner’s counsel that apparently his client was most interested in holding of the general election as no political party so far approached the courts on the matter.

The lawyer said the matter was of public importance as it affected vital fundamental rights of the citizens.

He argued that the holding of elections within a period of 90 days of the dissolution of assemblies is a salient feature of the Constitution and any delay in this regard beyond the period as mandated by Article 224(2) of the Constitution, will be a blatant violation of Article(s) 4, 5, 6, 9, 17, 51, 106 and 224.

He said any delay in the elections to the National Assembly, other than on the command of the Constitution, would amount to subversion of the supreme law and violation of the principles of democracy and rule of law.

The counsel pointed out that since the National Assembly was dissolved a few days before the expiry of its tenure, the general elections had to be conducted within 90 days of the dissolution under Article 224 (2) of the Constitution.

He said after the dissolution of the assembly by the president on the advice of the prime minister, the president shall fix a date for the election not later than 90 days.

However, he said the delay in elections was due to the ECP’s violation of the constitutional rights and provisions relating to timely elections.

He argued that the Constitution does not grant the ECP exclusive authority and responsibility to announce election dates, but it requires consultation by the commission with the president.

The lawyer asked the court to declare that the ECP cannot give a date for the election, and if it is held that the date can be given by the commission, it has no power to give a date beyond 90 days of the dissolution of the assembly.

He further asked the court to hold that the election be held on the date fixed by the president.

After hearing the arguments, Justice Aziz issued notices to the respondents for submission of their replies by Oct 19. Advocate Munir Ahmad filed the petition.

Separately, Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh of the LHC adjourned a similar petition filed by Advocate Muqsit Saleem.

The ECP filed its reply questioning the locus standi of the petitioner to agitate the matter before the court.

The judge directed the federal government to submit its reply by Oct 19.

Published in Dawn, October 3rd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.