ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) Chief Justice Aamer Farooq on Friday asked a Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawyer to clarify the reservations of party chief Imran Khan over his transfer from Attock to Adiala jail, when the order was given on his own request.

The chief justice also remi­n­ded Advocate Sher Afzal Mar­wat that he was the one who had filed the petition seeking the PTI leader’s transfer and asked him about the authenticity of reports that Mr Khan was shifted without his consent.

In response, Mr Marwat said the PTI did not officially issue a statement on this issue.

During the hearing of a civil miscellaneous application seeking the early disposal of a petition against the jail trial of Mr Khan in the cipher case, Advocate Marwat argued that the Special Court (Official Secrets Act) Judge was about to commence the trial while the petition challenging it had yet to be decided.

Justice Farooq explained that he had already reserved judgement in the matter, which is expected to be announced next week.

Decision on plea challenging holding of trial in Adiala jail likely by next week

Mr Marwat then complained that the jail administration did not provide ex-PM Khan the facilities he was entitled to.

Justice Farooq said the court had already issued notices to the respondents on a petition seeking better facilities for the PTI chairman.

Advocate Shuaib Shaheen, an official spokesperson for the PTI chairman, told Dawn that the petition seeking transfer of Mr Khan was filed after Additional District and Sess­ions Judge Humayun Dilawar sent him to Adiala jail in the Toshakhana case, but he was incarcerated in Attock instead.

He explained that his petition seeking jail transfer remained pending for weeks, while Mr Khan became accustomed to life in Attock jail.

The spokesperson made it clear that Mr Khan had never complained about the conduct of administration of Attock jail.

He explained this might have been why PTI lawyer Shi­raz Ranjha told the trial court that Mr Khan was shifted to Adiala jail without his consent.

During his exchange with the judge, the counsel said that the environment in the Attock jail was far better than the crowded Adiala jail, adding that Mr Khan could walk and exercise in the Attock jail, but these facilities were unavailable in Adiala.

Meanwhile, Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain of the Anti-Terrorism Court issued notices on three and Additional District and Sessions Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra on six bail petitions of Imran Khan. The nine petitions were earlier dismissed by the courts for non-prosecution, but the IHC chief justice allowed their revival.

Published in Dawn, October 7th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Economic plan
Updated 02 Jan, 2025

Economic plan

Absence of policy reforms allows the bureaucracy a lot of space to wriggle out of responsibility.
On life support
02 Jan, 2025

On life support

PAKISTAN stands at a precarious crossroads as we embark on a new year. Pildat’s Quality of Democracy report has...
Harsh sentence
02 Jan, 2025

Harsh sentence

USING lawfare to swiftly get rid of political opponents makes a mockery of the legal system, especially when ...
Looking ahead
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

Looking ahead

The dawn of 2025 brings with it hope of a more constructive path to much-needed stability.
On the front lines
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

On the front lines

THE human cost of terrorism in 2024 was staggering. The ISPR reports 383 officers and soldiers embraced martyrdom...
Avoiding reform
01 Jan, 2025

Avoiding reform

PAKISTAN’S economic growth significantly slowed down to a modest 0.92pc during the first quarter of the present...