LAHORE: An anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Monday declared charge sheets in 11 cases pertaining to May 9 riots ‘incomplete’ and directed the prosecution to resubmit them after removing deficiencies.

The prosecution had on Sept 28 submitted the challans against PTI leaders and workers, declaring them guilty of the offences mentioned in the FIRs of attack on the corps commander house and other cases.

ATC Judge Abher Gul Khan observed that prosecution had failed to attach statements of several witnesses and reports of photogrammetric tests of suspects with the challans.

Joint investigation teams conducted probe into May 9 cases and declared PTI Chairman Imran Khan and over 900 other party leaders and activists guilty of all the offences mentioned in FIRs.

The prosecution alleged that violent protests led by the suspects on May 9 were part of a planned conspiracy against the state. Over “400 pieces of video evidence, including speeches of the PTI chairman, proved that the attacks on military installations and premises in cantonment areas were pre-planned”, it stated.

Prosecution directed to resubmit challans with missing documents

Charges of mutiny and waging war against the state have been included in these cases and reports from the FIA and intelligence agencies have been attached with the challans. As many as 368 suspects, including party leaders, have been booked in the corps commander house attack case alone.

Replies sought on Khadija’s plea

On the other hand, the Lahore High Court sought replies from the Punjab police chief and others on a petition filed by fashion designer Khadija Shah seeking details of all cases registered against her.

Justice Ali Baqar Najafi heard initial arguments of the counsel for the petitioner, who is on judicial remand in multiple cases related to the May 9 riots. He directed a law officer to submit replies on behalf of the respondents on Tuesday (today).

Advocate Sameer Khosa, counsel for the petitioner, argued that she had been falsely implicated by police in the cases as she did not commit any unlawful act on May 9. He said the petitioner had a right to know if there are any cases made against her to have a fair trial.

Published in Dawn, October 10th, 2023

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...