ISLAMABAD: The Sup­­reme Court has retu­rned a petition against enf­orced disappearances for being an “individual grievance” and “not raising any question of public importance”.

Senior lawyer Aitzaz Ahsan had filed the application through Advocate Sardar Latif Khosa on October 25 against the “illegal and unlawful practice of enforced disappearances”, including that of political leaders.

He sought a direction for provincial governments to submit a list of “missing persons” in the custody of state authorities and a report identifying law enforcement agencies involved in this practice.

The Supreme Court’s registrar office stated that the petition was filed under Article 184(3). The article gives the court an “extraordinary jurisdiction” and empowers it to take notice of any matter in which people’s fundamental rights are violated.

In the note attached with the returned petition, the registrar office stated that the petition could not be entertained as Mr Ahsan didn’t point out “as to what questions of public importance” regarding the enforcement of fundamental rights were involved in this case.

Furthermore, the petitioner invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for redressing “an individual grievance”, which was not permissible.

The petitioner didn’t approach any other forum before filing the case “and has not provided any justification for not doing so”.

The petition

In his petition, the senior lawyer had claimed that the victims of enforced disappearances included journalists, politicians, bureaucrats and other voices critical of the government.

It referred to the disappearance of Awami Muslim League chief Sheikh Rashid and current and former PTI leaders, including Farrukh Habib, Sadaqat Ali Abbasi, Usman Dar and anchorperson Imran Riaz Khan.

Mr Ahsan requested the court to declare enforced disappearances “a constitutional violation”.

Enforced disappearances violate various provisions of the Constitution, including articles 4, 9, 10, 14, 19 and 25, it added.

“Surely, as the guardian of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, the apex court will not look the other way while the state acts with total impunity,” the petition said.

Published in Dawn, November 12th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.