Labour rebellion as UK MPs vote on Gaza ceasefire

Published November 16, 2023
Keir Starmer, leader of Britain’s Labour Party, speaks during the Prime Minister’s Questions, at the House of Commons in London, Britain November 15, 2023. — Reuters
Keir Starmer, leader of Britain’s Labour Party, speaks during the Prime Minister’s Questions, at the House of Commons in London, Britain November 15, 2023. — Reuters

LONDON: With a massive pro-Palestine demonstration taking place outside parliament, UK’s House of Commons voted on Wed­nesday on a divisive amendment calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, with nearly 70 Labour MPs going against the party leadership.

However, both motions on Gaza were defeated, as majority MPs voted against them.

The Labour motion on Gaza called for a humanitarian pause whereas the Scottish National Party (SNP) motion sought release of Israeli prisoners, end of the Gaza siege and an immediate ceasefire.

During the debate, the drama unfolded live as Labour MPs voting for the SNP’s ceasefire motion simultaneously tweeted resignations from their frontbench posts. Labour MP and shadow minister for women and equities Yasmin Qureshi was the first to resign from her post as she supported a ceasefire vote. MP Afzal Khan from Manchester Gorton followed, resigning from his post as shadow minister for exports.

Both Labour and SNP motions defeated

Tory MPs, however, reiterated their support for humanitarian pauses, and took exception to the term ceasefire. One MP said the word ceasefire implies “only one side, that is Israel, should stop violence, which is not the solution”.

Ahead of the vote, there was high political drama within the Labour party as SNP-led ceasefire vote split opinion. Thousands of constituents rang Labour MPs, including frontbench shadow ministers, and persuaded them to vote against the party’s position and for a ceasefire in Gaza. Nearly 70 Labour MPs defied their leader to call for a ceasefire now, and nearly 50 councillors resigned from the party over the leadership’s position on the war.

Zarah Sultana, Labour MP for Coventry South, tweeted, “In my nearly 4 years as an MP, I’ve been contacted by more constituents about Gaza and the call for a ceasefire than any other policy issue.”

As Keir Starmer in recent weeks stated a ceasefire would only embolden Hamas, his comments left the Labour party divided. Labour’s official position on the conflict is to call for a “humanitarian pause” rather than a full ceasefire, which is the same position as the UK government and the US.

There were multiple reports of Labour MPs being pressured by the party leadership to abstain from voting for a ceasefire as they could be sacked. But on Wednesday, several prominent Labour MPs even before the amendment was open to voting tweeted they would vote for a ceasefire.

Labour shadow minister from Bradford West Naz Shah said she would back an amendment, calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. Ms Shah said, “It would be a grave injustice if the world turned a blind eye while innocent Palestinians are being murdered by the hour.”

During the Prime Minister’s Questions, SNP MP Stephen Mark Flynn in the Commons said, “How much worse does it need to get? 4,609 children are dead, babies in the neonatal ICU are dying because they don’t have access to oxygen. For members across this house, this [vote] is a question of values and conscience.”

The PM resp­onded, “It’s right that Israel is able to defend itself as it suffered an appalling attack by Hamas which is a terror organisation. We have consistently called for humanitarian pau­ses so aid can get in and hospital staff and foreign nationals can get out.”

Labour MP from Bradford East Imran Hussain quit his frontbench role last week to “strongly advocate for a ceasefire” and stated he would vote for the SNP’s ceasefire amendment. He said: “A foreign policy that is driven by values would not still be advocating the four hour pauses that do nothing to alleviate the suffering of innocent men, women and children.”

Published in Dawn, November 16th, 2023

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.