Palestinians raise flags and placards as they gather around a statue of the late South African president Nelson Mandela in Ramallah, on Thursday, to celebrate the landmark genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice.—AFP
Palestinians raise flags and placards as they gather around a statue of the late South African president Nelson Mandela in Ramallah, on Thursday, to celebrate the landmark genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice.—AFP

• Quoting Israeli ministers, Pretoria argues intent to destroy Gaza Strip nurtured at ‘highest levels’ of govt in Tel Aviv
• Israel plays victim card, claims it is fighting ‘terrorists’

THE HAGUE: South Africa accused Israel on Thursday of carrying out genocide in Gaza and demanded that the UN’s top court order an emergency suspension of Israel’s devastating military campaign in the Palestinian enclave.

On the first of two days of hearings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), also known as the World Court, South Africa said Israel’s attack on Gaza, which has demolished much of the coastal enclave and killed more than 23,000 people, aimed to bring about “the destruction of the (territory’s) population”.

“The intent to destroy Gaza has been nurtured at the highest level of state,” Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, advocate of the High Court of South Africa, told the court. He said Israel’s political and military leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, were among “the genocidal inciters”.

“That is evident from the way in which this military attack is being conducted,” he said.

Israel rejected the accusations of genocide as false and baseless and said South Africa was speaking on behalf of Hamas — which Pretoria said was untrue. Netanyahu said the court had been presented with “hypocrisy and lies”.

“Today we saw an upside-down world. Israel is accused of genocide while it is fighting against genocide,” he said in a statement.

“Israel is fighting murderous terrorists who carried out crimes against humanity: they slaughtered, they raped, they burned, they dismembered, they beheaded — children, women, elderly, young men and women,” he said.

Laying out its allegations of genocidal acts, South Africa pointed to Israel’s sustained bombing campaign and to comments by Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, who said days after the Oct 7 Hamas raid that Israel would impose a total blockade as part of a battle against “human animals”.

“The evidence of genocidal intent is not only chilling, it is also overwhelming and incontrovertible,” Ngcukaitobi said.

The 1948 Genocide Convention, enacted in the wake of the Holocaust, defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group”.

Emergency ruling

Since Israeli forces launched their attack, nearly all of Gaza’s 2.3 million people, one of the world’s most densely populated places, have been driven from their homes at least once, causing a humanitarian catastrophe.

“Every day, there is mounting, irreparable loss of life, property, dignity, and humanity for the Palestinian people,” said Adila Hassim, advocate of South Africa’s high court.

Post-apartheid South Africa has long defended the Palestinian cause, a relationship forged when the African National Congress’s struggle against white-minority rule was cheered on by Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organisation.

South Africa concluded its arguments by requesting emergency measures to stop the Israeli bombardment of Gaza. The ICJ’s decisions are final and without appeal, but it has no way to enforce them.

In its court filings, South Africa cited Israel’s failure to provide food, water, medicine and other essential assistance to Gaza.

In Gaza, Amer Salah, 23, who is sheltering in a UN school in the south after fleeing his home, said he hoped the trial would help pile pressure on Israel.

“We call upon the world to say enough to Israeli killings, enough to massacres, enough to the destruction of Gaza, enough to the bloodshed,” he said. Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri said the group was following the court proceedings with great interest.

Published in Dawn, January 12th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...