ISLAMABAD: Former director general of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) retired Lt Gen Faiz Hameed has rejected the allegations of his involvement in the constitution of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) benches to prolong the detention of former premier Nawaz Sharif and his daughter Maryam Nawaz.

The ex-spymaster, who submitted his response to the petition filed before the Supreme Court by former senior puisne judge of the IHC Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, claimed the judge had dragged him into the case for no reason.

The apex court is scheduled to take up on Tuesday (today) the petition against a decision of the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) about Mr Siddiqui’s dismissal from service and an Oct 11, 2018, notification under which he was removed for a speech he had delivered at Rawalpindi Bar Association.

Last month, Mr Siddiqui impleaded retired Lt Gen Hameed, three retired brigadiers Irfan Ramay, Faisal Marwat and Tahir Wafai, former IHC chief justice Mohammad Anwar Khan Kasi, former SC registrar Arbab Mohammad Arif in the case.

SC to take up Justice Siddiqui’s appeal against his dismissal today

In his speech, Justice Siddiqui had accused the ISI of influencing the court proceedings and forming benches of choice.

The former spymaster stated in his reply the “benches for hearing appeals were to be constituted by the Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), and not by the petitioner [who was then senior puisne judge], and as such if Respondent No 3 [Gen Faiz Hameed] had any desire [which he could not dare to entertain] to have a bench of his choice to be constituted he would have approached the IHC chief justice, to do so, rather than to involve the petitioner in this matter.”

According to the petition, the bench constituted by the then IHC chief justice Mohammad Anwar Khan Kasi comprised the finest judges of the high court and one of the two judges who heard the matter and suspended Mr Sharif’s sentence was later elevated to the Supreme Court.

The former chief justice and retired brigadier Ramay have also denied the allegations levelled against them.

Published in Dawn, January 23rd, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram ‘roadmap’
Updated 25 Dec, 2024

Kurram ‘roadmap’

The state must provide ironclad guarantees that the local population will be protected from all forms of terrorism.
Snooping state
25 Dec, 2024

Snooping state

THE state’s attempts to pry into citizens’ internet activities continue apace. The latest in this regard is a...
A welcome first step
25 Dec, 2024

A welcome first step

THE commencement of a dialogue between the PTI and the coalition parties occupying the treasury benches in ...
High troop losses
Updated 24 Dec, 2024

High troop losses

Continuing terror attacks show that our counterterrorism measures need a revamp. Localised IBOs appear to be a sound and available option.
Energy conundrum
24 Dec, 2024

Energy conundrum

THE onset of cold weather in the country has brought with it a familiar woe: a severe shortage of piped gas for...
Positive cricket change
24 Dec, 2024

Positive cricket change

HEADING into their Champions Trophy title defence, Pakistan are hitting the right notes. Mohammad Rizwan’s charges...