ISLAMABAD: As a six-judge Supreme Court bench resumes on Monday the hearing of a set of intra-court appeals (ICA) in the case of civilians’ military trial, a petition has been filed in the apex court to restrain federal and provincial governments from engaging a private counsel to plead the matter.

Moved through senior counsel Faisal Siddiqui on behalf of some of the respondents, the fresh application requested the court to issue directions that only attorney general for Pakistan (AGP) should plead the case.

Headed by Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, the six-judge bench which will take up the ICAs, also comprises Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan.

Earlier on Dec 13, 2023, the Supreme Court, by a majority of five to one, had suspended the short order of October 23 that declared as unconstitutional the trial of 103 civilians identified in relation to their alleged involvement in the May 9 violence.

Intra-court appeals to be heard today

The plea against hiring the private counsel argued that the AGP office filed five ICAs on behalf of federal government, but the ministries of defence, interior and Balochistan government engaged private counsel to represent them during the appeals.

This act of federal and and provincial governments to engage private counsel is “against the binding directions laid down by SC,” the application contended.

It cited the court’s order in the 2017 Rasheed Ahmad case which laid down the circumstances in which the government can engage a private counsel.

The engagement of private counsel could only be sanctioned for compelling reasons and in the public interest and not to protect or save a particular individual or for any other ‘ulterior motives’, the application said.

The federal as well as the Balochistan governments brought forth no certificate or approval to show that a private counsel was to be engaged as AGP and other law officers in his office were incapable of attending to the case, whether due to lack of constitutional or technical expertise or otherwise, the petition noted.

Therefore, in view of the lack of such certificate or approval, no private counsel could appear or argue on behalf of the federal and the provincial governments, the petitioners argued.

Published in Dawn, January 29th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...