Course correction

Published February 24, 2024

THE PTI emerged from the Feb 8 elections as Pakistan’s largest political party. It should start acting like one.

The party founder’s decision to write to the IMF and urge it to call for an independent audit of the election results before it considers extending more loans was unbecoming and should have been reconsidered. There was no need for the PTI to engage in such tactics to demonstrate its seriousness about recovering its allegedly stolen mandate.

Even with its present numbers, it has more than enough leverage in three different assemblies to keep the pressure on the state without ever needing to involve an external stakeholder.

It must realise that any effort to ‘recover’ its mandate will entail a long legal struggle, during which the party and its supporters will periodically find themselves short on patience. However, resorting to extreme measures will only weaken their cause and could set them back in their efforts.

There is no denying that Pakistan’s present political landscape is much messier now than before, thanks to the ECP’s failure to hold a fair election and ensure transparency in its results. But this does not mean that those who feel they have been wronged should start engaging in acts of political arson to make their dissatisfaction known.

There are many legitimate means to protest, both within and outside parliament. There are also many different forums available through which the election results can and should be challenged. All of these can be resorted to as the PTI continues its fight for what it considers to be its right. If it goes overboard instead, the party risks repeating the mistakes it made in May last year, which only ended up giving room for the state to exercise its oppressive tendencies. There is prudence in acting with restraint.

The country cannot afford a re-run of the past two years. As a major representative of the Pakistani electorate, the PTI has an important role to play. The political configuration today is considerably different than what it was during the PDM regime.

Now that it has returned to parliament, the PTI will get to weigh in on any new deals the incoming government will strike with international lending agencies. If it plays the role of opposition right, the party will be able to pressure the government to make decisions that are in everybody’s best interests. It should not abandon that power and responsibility while expecting an external stakeholder to set things right.

Let the IMF make its own assessments and reach its own conclusions; it has enough experience dealing with the country in any case. The PTI’s job should be to focus on protecting its constituencies’ interests with whatever power it has been able to seize.

Published in Dawn, February 24th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.