PESHAWAR: Opposition members in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly announced on Thursday that they would challenge Governor Ghulam Ali’s move to call the assembly’s session for the swearing-in of members in the court of law.

The assembly’s secretariat didn’t issue a notification for the sitting despite the issuance of the governor’s orders for it on Wednesday.

“We [the opposition] are going to the high court on Friday [against the governor’s orders to call the assembly],” Pakistan Peoples Party MPA Ahmad Kundi told Dawn.

Earlier in the day, the office of assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati formally sought the opinion of the law department about whether the governor’s order in question was in line with the Constitution.

Speaker seeks opinion of law dept about Ghulam Ali’s move

The speaker’s letter read, “A letter was received from the principal secretary to the governor [Ghulam Ali], where the governor ordered to summon the session on 22nd March for the taking of oaths of its members elected to reserved and minority seats notified by the Election Commission of Pakistan on 4th March, 2024.”

It added that the governor’s letter was handed over by Opposition Leader in the provincial assembly Dr Ibadullah to the secretary of the provincial assembly “in person instead of through a proper channel.”

The speaker’s office asked the law department whether Article 109 of the Constitution empowered the governor to call the assembly’s session on his own “even if it is read with the Constitution’s Articles 48(2) and 105(5) or is Article 109 substantially subject to Clause 1 of Article 105, adding whether the summoning of the assembly session is the discretion of the governor or it is subject to the advice of the cabinet or the chief minister.”

It also questioned the status of a case pending with the Peshawar High Court regarding the notification issued by the ECP on March 4, 2024, about reserved seats in the provincial assembly.

The speaker’s office asked the law department whether the letter of the governor about the assembly’s sitting without carrying the signatures of the required number of MPAs under Clauses 2 and 3 of the Constitution’s Article 54 read with Article 127 is legally and constitutionally correct.

“What if the summoning order in question is not in consonance with the Constitution’s mandate? Does the order still need to be notified in pursuance of Rule 3 of the provincial assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Procedure and Conduct of Business Rules, 1988?” read the communication of the speaker’s office.

The speaker’s office requested the law department to inform it about how to proceed in the matter or otherwise as required under Rule 3 of the Provincial Assembly of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Procedure and Conduct of Business Rules, 1988.

“When the Assembly is summoned under Article 109 and Clause 7 of Article 130 or Clause 3 of Article 54 read with Article 127 of the Constitution, the secretary shall intimate to each member the date, time, and place fixed by the governor or the speaker, as the case may be, for the meeting of the assembly and shall cause a notification in respect thereof to be published in the gazette,” it said.

On Wednesday, Mr Ali called the provincial assembly’s sitting for Friday for the swearing-in of members who were elected to reserved and minority seats and notified by the Election Commission of Pakistan on March 4, according to an official document.

Mr Ali’s move to call a provincial assembly session caused a tiff with the newly-elected government, which called it unconstitutional.

“The governor can request the speaker of the provincial assembly to call a session but cannot call a sitting on his own. It is the discretion of the speaker to call the assembly and prepare its agenda,” said adviser to the chief minister on information and public relations Barrister Mohammad Ali Saif in a statement. It announced that it was in contact with its legal team about its response to the unconstitutional orders of the governor.

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly has 30 reserved seats, including 26 for women and four for non-Muslims. The Sunni Ittehad Council, which has 90 PTI-backed members in the assembly, was denied its share of the reserved seats by the Election Commission of Pakistan. Those seats went to other parties that have presence in the house, including JUI-F, PML-N, PPPP, ANP, and PTI-Parliamentarians.

Published in Dawn, March 22nd, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.