PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Friday directed the Election Commission of Pakistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly’s speaker to respond to a petition filed by Pakistan Peoples Party-Parliamentarians MPAs, elected on the seats reserved for women, for the calling of the assembly session for their swearing-in.

A bench consisting of Justice Shakeel Ahmad and Justice Sahibzada Asadullah issued the order after a preliminary hearing into the petition of Shazia Tehmas, Mehr Sultana, Farzana Shireen, Ashbar Jan Jadoon, and Naima Kanwal against the speaker’s failure to convene the assembly session for their oath-taking.

It fixed March 26 for the next hearing, asking the respondents, including ECP and the Assembly’s speaker and its secretary, to submit their respective responses to the petition.

The petition was filed after the KP governor summoned the assembly’s session for March 22 but the assembly’s secretariat declined to hold the sitting and sought the opinion of the law department about the governor’s move.

Lawyer Saqib Raza appeared for the petitioners and contended that the ECP had issued a notification on March 4 wherein it had notified 20 MPAs-elect on the basis of proportional representation of seats won by different political parties.

He said that the present petitioners were also notified as MPAs-elect in the said notification.

The lawyer argued that under the Constitution, the speaker of the assembly should have convened a session of the assembly for the oath-taking of the notified MPAs-elect. He, however, said the session was not convened, after which the KP governor had issued an order under Article 109 of the Constitution for the convening of the session on March 22.

Mr Raza pointed out that the Senate elections to fill 11 seats were scheduled to be held on April 2. He added that every vote was crucial for that electoral exercise.

The lawyer argued that the government in the province had conspired “not to allow the oath taking of those MPAs-elect to stop them from voting in the Senate polls, and for that purpose, the assembly’s secretariat wasn’t convening the session on political grounds.”

When the bench asked the lawyer whether the session convened by the governor was going to be held today (Friday), he replied that the assembly’s secretariat declared in a news release that sitting wouldn’t take place.

The court also wondered why the decision about the allocation of the provincial assembly’s reserved seats to political parties was recently taken by a larger bench of the high court and why those MPAs-elect weren’t allowed to take oaths.

Published in Dawn, March 23rd, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.