LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday reserved verdict on two petitions seeking a direction to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to appoint additional election tribunals in Punjab.

PTI-backed independent candidates advocate Salman Akram Raja and Rao Omar Hashim Khan, who had lost their general election from NA-128, Lahore and NA-139, Pakpa-ttan respectively filed the petitions.

The petitions contended that the ECP notified five election tribunals each for Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, three for Balochistan, and one for Islamabad pursuant to nominations sent by the chief justices of the respective high courts.

However, in Punjab, the ECP made a request to the LHC chief justice to nominate nine judges for appointment as election tribunals, the petitioner said. It said initially, two of the judges nominated by the LHC were appointed as tribunals.

The petitions asked the court to order the ECP to appoint additional election tribunals in light of the recommendations of the LHC for expeditious disposal of the petitions regarding the general election of 2024.

After hearing arguments from all parties, Justice Shahid Karim reserved the verdict.

Fawad plea: A Lahore High Court two-judge bench on Monday reserved its verdict on a petition of former federal minister Fawad Chaudhry seeking permission to attend trial proceedings of criminal cases against him through video link.

Previously, a single bench comprising Chief Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan had heard the petition. Later, the chief justice transferred the petition to a division bench comprising Justice Farooq Haider and Justice Shakil Ahmad.

After a government’s lawyer and the petitioner’s counsel concluded their arguments, the division bench reserved its verdict.

The counsel argued that dozens of cases were registered against the petitioner in different cities of Punjab. He said it was not humanly possible for the petitioner to physically attend the trial proceedings of each case.

He said the petitioner should be allowed to attend the hearings on video link.

Opposing the petition, an additional advocate general argued that the superior courts could not intervene in the matter of the trial courts. He said only the trial court could decide whether to permit attendance of an accused through video link.

The LHC had previously granted protective bail to Fawad Chaudhry in 36 cases with a direction to appear before the trial courts concerned for further relief of pre-arrest bail. — Staff Reporter

Published in Dawn, May 28th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Elusive justice
Updated 04 Jul, 2024

Elusive justice

Till the Pakistani justice system institutionalises the fundamental principles of justice, it cannot fulfil its responsibilities.
High food prices
04 Jul, 2024

High food prices

THAT the country’s exports of raw food rose by 37pc in the last financial year over the previous one is a welcome...
Paralysis in academia
04 Jul, 2024

Paralysis in academia

LIKE all other sectors, higher education is not immune to the debilitating financial crisis that is currently ...
Orwellian state
Updated 03 Jul, 2024

Orwellian state

Implementing a system to spy on one’s own people is a perverse abuse of power and should be stopped forthwith.
Coping with disaster
03 Jul, 2024

Coping with disaster

THE monsoons are practically upon us, bringing with them the fear of urban flooding, flash floods, and accompanying...
Jail security
Updated 03 Jul, 2024

Jail security

If those convicted of murder, rape or terrorism are able to break free, it will not reflect well on the competence of our criminal justice system.