MADRID: A Spanish judge ordered football ruling bodies FIFA and UEFA to halt their opposition to a parallel European competition known as the European Super League (ESL), ruling they were practising anticompetitive behaviour and abusing their dominant position.

The ruling echoed an earlier one by the Euro­pean Court of Justice (ECJ) which ordered the two governing bodies “to halt anti-competitive behaviour”.

The court said FIFA and UEFA had imposed “unjustified and disproportionate restrictions” on free competition within the market, in a case filed by the promoters of the Super League.

Real Madrid and Barcelona are strong supporters of the project that most of Europe’s other big clubs have abandoned.

The scope of the court’s decision is uncertain, however, as it tackles regulations that have been completely rewritten in the interim period.

The case was brought before the Madrid Comme­rcial Court by A22 Sports Management, the promoters of the three-tier, 80-club project.

A22 were buoyed after a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in December 2023, which also ruled that the ban on the Super Lea­gue was contrary to Euro­pean law, finding that UEFA did not have clear criteria for authorising or not authorising new competitions.

“It is not possible to impose a prohibition or restriction as a matter of principle, in other words to prohibit any other project in the future,” explained judge Sofia Gil Garcia in her ruling on Monday.

“To admit the contrary would be tantamount to accepting a kind of ban ... on any football competition project” that competes with the current Cham­pions League, continued the judge.

Spain were not among 26 European countries who signed a joint declaration against projects such as the Super League in February, stressing the need for “open” competition.

Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus and nine other top European clubs annou­nced the Super League project in April, 2021.

The move collapsed within 48 hours, however, after a public outcry and threats from UEFA and FIFA that forced Manche­ster United, Liverpool, Manchester City, Chelsea, Tottenham Hotspur, Arsenal, AC Milan, Inter Milan and Atletico Madrid to withdraw.

However, the project was relaunched this winter after the ECJ ruled that the powers of these two bodies were not “governed by any criteria ensuring that they are transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate”.

UEFA has since corrected this ‘shortcoming’ with new, much more detailed regulations adop­ted in June 2022.

“This ruling does not mean that the so-called ‘Super League’ has been approved or validated,” said UEFA in response to the ECJ ruling.

In a Monday statement, La Liga insisted the ruling does not explicitly support the creation of the Super League.

“The judgement is not final, nor does it bring anything new of significance,” said La Liga chief Javier Tebas, firmly opposed to the Super League project.

Published in Dawn, May 28th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...
Rushed legislation
Updated 06 Nov, 2024

Rushed legislation

For all its stress on "supremacy of parliament", the ruling coalition has wasted no opportunity to reiterate where its allegiances truly lie.
Jail reform policy
06 Nov, 2024

Jail reform policy

THE state is making a fresh attempt to improve conditions in Pakistan’s penitentiaries by developing a national...
BISP overhaul
06 Nov, 2024

BISP overhaul

IT has emerged that the spouses of over 28,500 Sindh government employees have been illicitly benefiting from BISP....