PPP feels ‘left out’ from budget, defamation law discussions

Published June 11, 2024
PPP Central Punjab general secretary Syed Hassan Murtaza addresses a press conference in Lahore on June 10. — X/PPP
PPP Central Punjab general secretary Syed Hassan Murtaza addresses a press conference in Lahore on June 10. — X/PPP

LAHORE: The PPP has openly expressed its concerns over a lack of consultation by the Punjab government on critical issues, such as the budget and the recently-promulgated defamation law.

Though the PPP is not formally part of a coalition government in the province since the PML-N enjoys a simple majority, it has supported the ruling party in the assembly during the legislative business.

PPP Central Punjab general secretary Syed Hassan Murtaza referred to this agreement on Monday when he said that his party didn’t vote for the PML-N “to prepare the budget in the kitchen”.

“You did not take PPP into confidence while preparing the budget proposals,” he said, addressing Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif at a press conference.

Murtaza says his party didn’t support Punjab govt for ‘solo decision making’; LHC to hear challenges to controversial act today

He claimed that this would be the first budget where the government didn’t take its allies and stakeholders into confidence.

No relief plan has been announced so far for the salaried class and pensioners in the budget, said the PPP leader.

He added that “PPP had high expectations” from CM Maryam that she would take the province forward as per the vision of her father, Nawaz Sharif.

However, he regretted that farmers, who form the country’s backbone, were suffering because of the Punjab government’s policies.

The provincial agriculture department “could not formulate a comprehensive policy” to procure wheat before the sowing started, and the indecision left the growers in a lurch after they toiled hard and reaped a bumper crop.

Mr Murtaza asked if the government would compensate the farmers for its delayed decision not to procure wheat this season.

‘No intention to join govt’

Referring to the Punjab Defamation Act 2024, the PPP leader said his party stood with journalists.

“The party is not in favour of restricting the freedom of expression. We’ll try to get the law withdrawn because we cannot become part of any anti-media law.”

He announced that his party would go to court against the law and the move, and the PPP high command would make a decision in this regard.

A day ago, PTI also announced challenging the law which has been severely criticised by political parties, civil society members and journalists.

He clarified that PPP was not involved in the drafting or the enactment of the law and rather tried to address stakeholders’ concerns.

In response to a question about formally joining the provincial government, Mr Murtaza added that any decision in this regard would be taken by PPP’s Central Executive Committee and at present, “there is no such intention”.

LHC fixes appeal

In a related development, the Lahore High Court (LHC) registrar has fixed the appeal against the Punjab Defamation Act 2024 for hearing.

A single-member bench comprising Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq will take up the matter today (Tuesday).

The challenge has been filed by journalists Riaz Ahmad Raja and Jaffar Ahmad Yar through Advocate Nadeem Sarwar on the grounds that the law was “in sheer violation” of the fundamental rights protected in the Constitution.

Earlier, the registrar’s office completed the scrutiny process after the petitioners furnished the gazette notification that was issued today.

The petition argued that instead of drafting a new law, the government should have amended the existing laws.

It added that the law had been introduced in haste without consulting journalists, and it aimed to control the media.

The definition of “journalist” and “newspaper” provided in the law was “vague, irrational and ambiguous”.

According to the petition, the law allows for defamation claims to be initiated without any proof, which is a clear violation of Article 10-A of the Constitution, which ensures a “fair trial” for every individual.

The petitioners requested the court to strike down the law for being contrary to fundamental rights of citizens enshrined in the Constitution.

Published in Dawn, June 11th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Resolution 901
Updated 01 Jul, 2024

Resolution 901

Our lawmakers’ failure to stand united in the face of foreign criticism may not have been unexpected but it was still disturbing to witness.
Nebulous definition
01 Jul, 2024

Nebulous definition

IS it a ‘vision’, a loose programme, or an actual kinetic ‘operation’? A week on, we don’t precisely know....
Stealing heritage
01 Jul, 2024

Stealing heritage

CONTRADICTIONS define Pakistan. While the country’s repository of antiquities can change its fortunes, recurrent...
Burdening the people
Updated 30 Jun, 2024

Burdening the people

The tax-heavy budget will make lives of avg Pakistanis even harder and falls far short of inspiring confidence in govt's ability to execute structural changes.
WikiLeaks’ legacy
30 Jun, 2024

WikiLeaks’ legacy

THE recent release from captivity of WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange has presented an opportunity to revisit the...
Iranian run-off
30 Jun, 2024

Iranian run-off

FRIDAY’S snap presidential election in Iran, called after the shock deaths of Ebrahim Raisi and members of his...