LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Friday heard more petitions challenging “The Punjab Defamation Act 2024”, giving diverse remarks on the freedom of expression and the government’s responsibility to protect citizens from slander.

Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq asked how the court could issue a stay order on the impugned law, stating that social media had turned everyone into a journalist and that common people also need protection.

“Is it journalism to claim that everyone in the courtroom bows down to a lawyer, judges went on the back foot, and press conferences happen every day after hearings,” the judge said, asking should such practices not be stopped.

The judge also observed that there were many laws where the government acted as both prosecutor and the judge.

Questioning the urgency behind such rapid legislation, the judge said if the petitioners proved that the legislative process was improper, the entire law would be nullified.

Advocate Azhar Siddique, the counsel for the Lahore Press Club, argued that a professional journalist was responsible for every news piece and laws and institutions existed to control fake news.

He said since the governor did not sign the bill, it should have been returned, and that the acting governor was not authorised to sign it.

LPC President Arshad Ansari said the journalists were promised that legislation would be made after consultation, but the government neither consulted them, nor addressed the flaws in the law.

The lawyer said the law violated fundamental rights as it did not grant the defendant the right to a fair trial, which was a constitutional requirement. He alleged that the government wanted to control professional journalists through the impugned law.

Justice Rafiq questioned how one can decide if a law should exist.

The judge also asked how one can undo the damage to someone’s reputation once it is tarnished.

The lawyer mentioned that all these issues were already covered under the Prevention of Electronic Crime Act 2016 (Peca) and making a new law was unnecessary as defamation laws already existed.

He added that the impugned law applied only to Punjab, asking if one could do whatever one wanted in other provinces. He said previously, federal laws applied countrywide.

The judge asked the counsel if such a law was needed in the country, to which the lawyer stated that the Peca was sufficient.

The judge noted that the Peca was for criminal cases.

The judge adjourned the hearing till July 4 and directed the advocate general office to come up with arguments on the points discussed in the court.

The other petition challenging the defamation law was filed by Opposition Leader in the Punjab Assembly, Ahmad Khan Bhachar.

Published in Dawn, June 15th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

A hasty retreat
Updated 28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

Govt should not extend its campaign of violence against PTI and its leaders, thinking it now has the upper hand. Enough is enough.
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...