CARLO Maria Vigano, ambassador of the Vatican to Washington, listens to Pope Francis speaking at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, in this file picture dated Sept 26, 2015.—AFP
CARLO Maria Vigano, ambassador of the Vatican to Washington, listens to Pope Francis speaking at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, in this file picture dated Sept 26, 2015.—AFP

VATICAN CITY: Italian Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, a fierce ultra-conservative critic of Pope Francis, has been found guilty of schism and excommunicated, the Vatican’s doctrinal office said on Friday.

Vigano, the papal envoy in Washington from 2011 to 2016, went into hiding in 2018 after alleging that the pope knew for years about sexual misconduct by US Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, but did nothing about it.

He had said the pope should resign and subsequently branded him a “false prophet” and a “servant of Satan”.

The Vatican rejected Vigano’s accusations of a cover-up of sexual misconduct and last month summoned him to answer charges of schism and denying the pope’s legitimacy.

In a statement on Friday, the doctrinal office said his public comments made it clear that he refused “to recognise and submit” to Pope Francis. He had also rejected the legitimacy of liberal reforms made by the Roman Catholic Church in the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, it said.

“At the conclusion of the penal process, the Most Reverend Carlo Maria Vigano was found guilty of the reserved delict (violation of the law) of schism,” the statement said, adding that he had been excommunicated, or banished, from the Church.

In a message on X, the 83-year-old Vigano remained unrepentant, publishing the full text of the decision against him, which warned that he could be expelled from the Roman Catholic priesthood if he persisted in his stance.

He urged Catholic faithful to voice their support for him, quoting Jesus in the New Testament: “If they keep quiet, the stones themselves will start shouting.”

The Vatican ruling was signed by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, and by its secretary, Father John Joseph Kennedy. As is normal in such matters, it was not signed by the pope, but it is highly unlikely that the punishment was meted out without his approval.

Vigano, who mostly communicates via the X social network, said last month that he had refused to take part in the disciplinary proceedings because he did not accept the legitimacy of the institutions behind it.

“I do not recognise the authority of the tribunal that claims to judge me, nor of its Prefect, nor of the one who appointed him,” he said.

Published in Dawn, July 6th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

All out
Updated 25 Feb, 2025

All out

PAKISTAN cricket captain Mohammad Rizwan’s assessment was brutal — it could not have been any other way. At ...
Bearing the brunt
25 Feb, 2025

Bearing the brunt

FOR the past several months, we have repeatedly been told by the prime minister and his cabinet that the government...
Afghan resettlement
25 Feb, 2025

Afghan resettlement

AFGHAN refugees who fled their country after the Taliban took over in 2021, and who hoped to resettle in the West,...
Taliban divisions
Updated 24 Feb, 2025

Taliban divisions

The only workable solution lies in Mullah Akhundzada loosening his iron grip on the country.
Oblivious to drought
24 Feb, 2025

Oblivious to drought

PAKISTAN faces two types of drought: one caused by dry weather or lower-than-normal rainfall, and the other ...
Digital children
24 Feb, 2025

Digital children

AS most parents with young children will agree, the easiest way to pacify a bawling child is to hand them a...