With no headway in talks, Torkham stays shut

Published August 14, 2024
GOODS transporters await the reopening of the Torkham border in Khyber, on Tuesday.—Photo by the writer
GOODS transporters await the reopening of the Torkham border in Khyber, on Tuesday.—Photo by the writer

KHYBER: The Tor­kham border crossing bet­ween Pakistan and Afgha­nistan remained closed for a second day, as border sec­urity officials could not reach an agreement on Tu­­e­­­sday over the construct­ion of a controversial check post on the Afghan side.

Sources at Torkham said that Afghan auth­o­ri­ties did not attend the scheduled meeting on Tu­e­sday afternoon while an­other meeting later in the evening was postpo­ned till Wednesday (today).

It was, however, speculated that the border would remain closed on Wednesday as well, due to Independence Day celebrations.

Sources said that tho­ugh Pakistani authorities had asked customs and immigration officials to report to their respective duties in anticipation of a possible reopening of the border later on Tuesday, but no progress was made until late evening.

They said the Afghan delegation failed to show up for a flag meeting scheduled for 3pm, with Pakistani authorities seeking another meeting in the evening.

But that meeting, too, could not take place due to unspecified reasons, sources said.

Customs and immigration officials posted at Torkham confirmed to Dawn they were instructed to remain on duty on Tuesday, but the border could not be reopened and thus no clearance of goods could take place.

Both trade activities and pedestrian movement remained suspended on Tuesday, they said, adding that the two sides could not reach an agreement about the modalities of border reopening.

A number of Afghan families, some travelling from Islamabad and different parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, reached Landi Kotal during the day after some unconfirmed posts appeared on social media about the reopening of border. However, they were disappointed to learn that the border was not opened till evening and had to move to Peshawar.

The situation remained peaceful during the day with border forces on both sides remaining alert but no exchange of fire occurred throughout the day.

On the other hand, Bacha Maina residents, who had shifted to safer places after the Monday crossfire, also stayed back and did not return to their homes for fear of any reoccurrence of the cross-border firing.

Kabul claims civilian casualties

Also on Tuesday, Afghan authorities claimed that three civilians were killed in Monday’s clashes between the two sides. Although Kabul accused Pakistan of being responsible for the deaths, a Pakistani official told AFP that three Pakistani soldiers were wounded in the exchange.

“Despite repeated warnings and objections from the Pakistani side, Afghan officials did not halt the construction, leading to escalating tensions,” the officer said.

There was no official word on the Afghan claim of three civilian casualties.

Published in Dawn, August 14th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan strikes
Updated 26 Dec, 2024

Afghan strikes

The military option has been employed by the govt apparently to signal its unhappiness over the state of affairs with Afghanistan.
Revamping tax policy
26 Dec, 2024

Revamping tax policy

THE tax bureaucracy appears to have convinced the government that it can boost revenues simply by taking harsher...
Betraying women voters
26 Dec, 2024

Betraying women voters

THE ECP’s recent pledge to eliminate the gender gap among voters falls flat in the face of troubling revelations...
Kurram ‘roadmap’
Updated 25 Dec, 2024

Kurram ‘roadmap’

The state must provide ironclad guarantees that the local population will be protected from all forms of terrorism.
Snooping state
25 Dec, 2024

Snooping state

THE state’s attempts to pry into citizens’ internet activities continue apace. The latest in this regard is a...
A welcome first step
25 Dec, 2024

A welcome first step

THE commencement of a dialogue between the PTI and the coalition parties occupying the treasury benches in ...