Traders’ strike

Published August 29, 2024

BARELY two months into the new fiscal year, the pressure groups have become active. On Wednesday, traders and retailers nationwide went on strike against new tax measures introduced by the Federal Board of Revenue, particularly its Tajir Dost Scheme. The scheme, which aims to formalise the retail sector by bringing traders and wholesalers into the tax net, has been opposed by various trade bodies since its inception. They find even the concessionary tax rates extended to them under the scheme unacceptable, citing high inflation, depressed economic activity and considerable increases in electricity tariffs. Wednesday’s strike saw significant participation in most major cities of Sindh, Punjab and KP, as well as in the federal capital, indicating how strong the voices of discontent are. However, their position is unreasonable, especially given Pakistan’s tight fiscal position; their anger would be better directed at demanding a say in where their taxes are to be spent.

Taxation is always a sensitive topic in the relationship between citizens and their state. Democracy sweetens the deal by giving the people a say, through their representatives, in their governments’ fiscal policies. Unfortunately for Pakistan, the current government is suffering from a severe legitimacy crisis, with many questioning its credentials as the true representative of the people. It is, perhaps, for this reason that several opposition parties have thought it opportune to jump on board with the striking traders. This, as pointed out, will prove counterproductive in the long run. The opposition parties, especially the Jamaat-i-Islami, have been rightly demanding relief for the people amidst soaring inflation, but conflating those demands with the traders lobbying for continued concessions demonstrates a lack of appreciation of the root causes of Pakistan’s crises. Our state-level policies have, for too long, been dictated by special interest groups such as the ones striking on Wednesday. The exemptions extended to them have invariably been paid for by other citizens in the form of higher taxes and inflation. Therefore, if it is relief for the common Pakistanis that the political parties seek, they should not only demand that the traders pay their dues, but that all other privileged segments do so as well. Their focus should remain on making sure that the government raises its revenues equitably and then spends them solely on public welfare rather than its own vested interests.

Published in Dawn, August 29th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

IMF hopes
14 Sep, 2024

IMF hopes

THE inclusion of Pakistan’s case on the agenda of the IMF Executive Board meeting later this month must end the...
Media unity
14 Sep, 2024

Media unity

IN recent years, media owners and senior decision-makers in newsrooms across the country have found themselves in...
Grim example
14 Sep, 2024

Grim example

THE struggle to eliminate extremism from society and create a more tolerant nation cannot succeed without the...
Monetary easing
Updated 13 Sep, 2024

Monetary easing

The fresh rate cut shows SBP's confidence over recent economic stability amid hopes of IMF Board approving new bailout.
Troubled waters
13 Sep, 2024

Troubled waters

THE proposed contentious amendments to the Irsa Act have stirred up quite a few emotions in Sindh. Balochistan, too,...
Deceptive records
13 Sep, 2024

Deceptive records

IN a post-pandemic world, we should know better than to tamper with grave public health issues, particularly fudging...