Legal games

Published September 30, 2024

THE ECP continues to dither. Despite the strong rebuke issued to it about two weeks earlier, it is still confused about how or whether the Supreme Court’s verdict in the reserved seats case should be implemented.

Having delayed implementing the ruling straight away when it was issued, it has now found a new excuse — a law to deny the PTI its rightful share of reserved seats, bulldozed through parliament in the month of August — behind which to take cover. ‘If the Supreme Court’s verdict is implemented, it would be a violation of the Elections (Second) Amendment Act of 2024; perhaps the apex court should clarify the effect of this new law in the interests of justice first,’ the ECP is now arguing.

At the same time, it wants the Supreme Court to stay the operation of its clarification order, issued on Sept 14, till all ‘confusion’ is cleared up. Further, it has cited a letter from National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, which states that since the Supreme Court’s ruling is based on ‘an old law’, it no longer needs to be implemented.

While the ECP has made a big show of its righteousness and respect for court rulings in its new petition, it has not explained why it reasoned that the detailed ruling issued by the Supreme Court goes against existing law. It is also strange for it to be relying so heavily on a letter issued by the Speaker to interpret what the new law states.

Is the National Assembly Speaker judge and jury or a court of law that his word will now prevail over legal judgments? The question of 39 lawmakers already notified by the ECP after the initial ruling as members of PTI’s parliamentary party also remains. What is their status now? Has the ECP accepted the Speaker’s letter as the word of the law and de-notified them?

Those who have been observing the ECP’s conduct in these past few months believe that this fresh application for clarification has little to do with its respect for rules and procedures or concerns for democratic principles. They fear it is nothing more than a new ploy to buy both itself and parliament more time. They point to its refusal to implement the ruling in full when it was first released, which is what gave the government enough time to come up with new legislation aimed at rendering the verdict ineffective.

Now, a ‘constitutional package’ aimed at debilitating the judiciary is about to be reintroduced, after which the possibility of such ‘inconveniences’ being raised by the courts will be forever put to bed. The ECP should stop playing games and take a clear position. It should not expect sympathy from the courts at this point.

Published in Dawn, September 30th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Closed doors
Updated 08 Jan, 2025

Closed doors

The nation’s fate has been decided through secret deals for too long, with the result that the citizenry has become increasingly alienated from the state.
Debt burden
08 Jan, 2025

Debt burden

THE federal government’s total debt stock soared by above 11pc year-over-year to Rs70.4tr at the end of November,...
GB power crisis
08 Jan, 2025

GB power crisis

MASS protests are not a novelty in Pakistan, and when the state refuses to listen through the available channels —...
Fragile peace
Updated 07 Jan, 2025

Fragile peace

Those who have lost loved ones, as well as those whose property has been destroyed in the clashes, must get justice.
Captive power cut
07 Jan, 2025

Captive power cut

THE IMF’s refusal to relax its demand for discontinuation of massively subsidised gas supplies to mostly...
National embarrassment
Updated 07 Jan, 2025

National embarrassment

The global eradication of polio is within reach and Pakistan has no excuse to remain an outlier.