CJP Isa regrets decisions to ‘validate martial laws’

Published October 8, 2024 Updated October 8, 2024 10:23am

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa on Monday regretted the repeated validation of martial laws in the country by the judiciary, wondering if the judges considered themselves above the law and not bound by the Constitution.

“Are judges of the superior judiciary so generous that they wholeheartedly extend end­orsement to every military coup in the country,” the CJP rema­rked, also questioning from where the judges acquired such an authority to accord approvals to martial laws.

He regretted that repea­ted citation of cases like the validation of extra-cons­titutional regi­mes des­­tro­yed the very fabric of the country.

These observations came during the hearing of a review petition, moved by Abdul Hameed, an emp­loyee of the Punjab population welfare department, which was eventually rejected by the court.

CJP Isa was also apparently disturbed at the preference by lawyers to quote previous SC judgments rather than Constitution and the law. He said such judgements should be cited as precedence only when there is an ambiguity in an identical matter rather than relying on case judgements every now and then without any presence of mind. He remarked judicial decisions were not above the Constitution.

Asking if the requirement of adhering to the Constitution and the law becomes redundant after becoming a judge, the chief justice said it seemed that time has come when refresher courses should be arranged for judges so that they stick to constitutional perimeters.

The CJP did not spare the lawyers and bemoaned that they never bothered to even bring the green book with them while appearing in courts to plead their cases.

Referring to the ‘undue’ criticism from different quarters over the alleged haste in fixing the SCBA petition seeking review of Article 63A that deals with the disqualification, the CJP reminded that the review pet­ition was taken by the Supreme Court after almost two and a half years.

Later, the SC rejected the review petition moved by the Punjab population welfare department employee.

Published in Dawn, October 8th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Terrorism upsurge
Updated 08 Oct, 2024

Terrorism upsurge

The state cannot afford major security lapses. It may well be that the Chinese nationals were targeted to sabotage SCO event.
Ban hammer
08 Oct, 2024

Ban hammer

THE decision to ban the PTM under the Anti-Terrorism Act is yet another ill-advised move by the state. Although the...
Water tensions
08 Oct, 2024

Water tensions

THE unresolved tensions over Indus water distribution under the 1991 Water Apportionment Accord demand a revision of...
A bloody year
Updated 07 Oct, 2024

A bloody year

Using the Oct 7 attacks as an excuse to wage endless aggression on Middle East, Israel has crossed all red lines.
Bleak cotton outlook
07 Oct, 2024

Bleak cotton outlook

THE extremely slow arrival of phutti at the ginning factories of Punjab and Sindh so far indicate a huge drop in the...
Killjoy neighbours
07 Oct, 2024

Killjoy neighbours

AT the worst of times in their bilateral relations, India and Pakistan have not shied away from carrying out direct...