The Supreme Court on Thursday disposed of a petition seeking a declaration that the government’s much-touted ‘Constitutional Package’ cannot be introduced or enacted by parliament after the plea was withdrawn.

The Consti­tutional Package comprises legislation proposing a set of constitutional amendments, including the extension of the top judge’s term.

Experts fear that the proposed amendments would virtually erode the independence of the judiciary by restricting the SC to only hearing appeals or petitions of civil and criminal nature.

Perturbed by the government’s plans, a group of lawyers, led by former Supreme Court Bar Association Abid Shahid Zuberi had moved a petition before the apex court in September to restrain the government from tabling the bill before parliament.

The petition was previously returned by the SC registrar’s office but was fixed for hearing in a supplementary cause list issued on Saturday. A petition against the amendments was also filed last week by the Balochistan Bar Council through Zuberi.

Today, a three-member bench — headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and also including Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Shahid Bilal Hasan — took up the plea today.

While a previous attempt by the ruling coalition to table the amendments in the Parliament had failed last month due to concerns raised by opposition parties, consensus on the legislation has drawn closer in recent days.

The heads of the PML-N, PPP, and the JUI-F met at Jati Umra a day ago, where the government parties virtually succeeded in securing the support of Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

On the other hand, a special parliamentary committee reviewing the amendments has given more time to PTI on its request to share its own draft.

The hearing

At the outset of the hearing, Advocate Hamid Khan appeared on behalf of the petitioners. He requested the court that he be allowed to withdraw the plea.

“Were you [Hamid Khan] appointed a lawyer only to withdraw the application?” CJP Isa asked. He remarked, “Abid Zuberi himself could have withdrawn the application.”

The chief justice noted that another similar application had been fixed for hearing with objections.

However, Khan responded, “We withdraw both applications.”

Subsequently, the bench disposed of the petitions at the request of the lawyer.

Opinion

Editorial

Successful summit
Updated 17 Oct, 2024

Successful summit

Platforms like SCO present an opportunity for states to set aside narrow differences.
Failed tax target
17 Oct, 2024

Failed tax target

THE government’s plan to document retailers for tax purposes through its ‘voluntary’ Tajir Dost Scheme appears...
More questions
17 Oct, 2024

More questions

THE alleged rape of a student at a private college in Lahore has sparked confusion, social media campaigns, ...
Two steps back
Updated 16 Oct, 2024

Two steps back

Instead of treating polio as a stand-alone emergency, it should be incorporated into a broader public health strategy.
Defunding varsities
16 Oct, 2024

Defunding varsities

IF a plan — apparently conjured up by foreign lenders — to defund public varsities goes ahead, tens of thousands...
Protecting children
16 Oct, 2024

Protecting children

THIS country’s children make the news for unfortunate reasons. At the core of their plight is the state’s...