No legislation on military courts in 27th Amendment: PML-N’s Barrister Malik

Published November 2, 2024
Advisor to the Prime Minister on Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik speaking during the program — DawnNewsTV
Advisor to the Prime Minister on Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik speaking during the program — DawnNewsTV

Advisor to the Prime Minister on Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik has denied that any legislation on military courts would be a part of the the mooted 27th Constitutional amendment, adding that PTI claims in this regard were “completely incorrect” and “misleading the public”.

While speaking to Dawn last month, a JUI-F leader had questioned whether the upcoming amendment would be aimed at “creating some way to transfer the cases of civilians to the military courts”.

Speaking on Dawn News programme Doosra Rukh, which aired on Friday, Barrister Malik made a clarification, saying: “I would like to mention that there is no discussion of military courts [in this amendment]”.

He claimed that PTI leader Salman Akram Raja’s allegations that the government was bringing in the amendment to create military courts were incorrect, adding that the party was “misleading the public.”

Talking about a possible timeline for the new amendment, Barrister Malik said, “In my understanding, this [amendment] will go into the new year, and it’s very early to say if it can be done this year as there are [just] two months left, but there are lot of international engagements, including COP […] foreign dignitary visits.”

When asked if the amendment would be tabled in 2025, the advisor to the premier said it was “possible”, adding that they had “initiated a conversation” so that whoever now agrees to be a party to it would come with “consensus”.

“Civil society, our allies and even the opposition [are party to it]. We haven’t dissolved the [special parliamentary] committee, it will continue working under the leadership of Khursheed Shah,” he said.

When asked if the amendment would cater to the people who voted in favour of the 26th Amendment, Barrister Malik replied in the affirmative.

“We wanted to keep the 26th Amendment focused on legal and judicial reforms […] and like you said judicial package, it was in that regard only, not anything else” he added.

He also explained that the government wanted to build a consensus regarding the amendment.

“We want to build an overall broad consensus and I’m on record saying that whenever the 27th Constitutional Amendment is brought, it will be brought in with consensus.”

The ruling coalition has been seemingly planning to table another amendment, colloquially known as the 27th Amendment, aimed at reforming local governments and “addressing issues skipped in previous legislation”.

These details were divulged by sources to Dawn following a meeting bet­ween Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and PPP Chairperson Bila­wal Bhutto-Zardari in Lahore, atten­ded by key leaders from both parties on October 27.

In contradicting statements, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar on Monday had declared that the government was not considering any such legislation. At the same time, Barr­ister Malik had hinted that the government could not only table “an amendment” in parliament, but would also be able to pass it.

However, it was not clear whether he was referring to a constitutional amendment bill or an ordinary piece of legislation. The statements came as sources indicated to Dawn that a bill to amend the SC Practice & Procedure Act could be introduced in the house soon.

These developments come after the recently passed 26th Amendment which brought changes to the Constitution, most of which pertain to the judiciary.

Some main reforms include taking away the Supreme Court’s suo motu powers, setting the chief justice of Pakistan’s (CJP) term at three years, and empowering the prime minister to appoint the next CJP from among the three most senior SC judges.

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...