AMERICANS were worried about the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on the recent presidential elections that saw a convicted felon, Donald Trump, being re-elected. But, according to an academic study on technology, the public probably does not understand the full extent of its influence on what they experience every day.

There have been obvious examples of Al-generated misinformation, like false audio and fake video postings, or memes intended to generate emotions and spread propaganda.

Al is also regularly used to generate legitimate campaign messages, like phone calls and texts. But behind those public examples, there are other ‘unseen’ jobs as well. Recent political campaigns have demonstrated how technologies are used to boost election outcomes by microtar-geting voters. There is a framework that analyses how political activists can use technologies to target voters.

Voters are represented as nodes of a network. Political activists reach out locally to voters and try to convince them to vote for their candidates. Depending on their technological advantage and budget, political activists target certain regions in the network where their activities are able to generate the largest vote-share gains.

Analytically and numerically, they quantify vote-share gains and savings in terms of budget as well as number of activists by employing superior targeting technologies compared to traditional campaigns.

Moreover, they demonstrate that the technological precision must surpass a certain threshold in order to lead to a vote-share gain or budget advantage.

Finally, by calibrating the technology parameters to the recent presidential elections in the United States, they show that a pure targeting technology advantage is consistent with Trump winning against Kamala Harris.

False or misleading claims by billionaire Elon Musk about the US elections amassed two billion views on social media platform X this year, according to a report by non-profit group Centre for Countering Digital Hate.

The platform also played a central role in enabling the spread of seriously false information about the critical battleground states that finally determined the outcome of the presidential race, which at one point appeared a tight one.

Trump’s recent campaign is the perfect example to analyse how AI and social media have been used extensively by at least one political party in Pakistan. These tools are still being used by the party to regain its lost position, malign political rivals, and create a hate-based narrative for its own narrow interests.

Hunaid Ali
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...
Strange claim
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Strange claim

In all likelihood, Pakistan and US will continue to be ‘frenemies'.
Media strangulation
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Media strangulation

Administration must decide whether it wishes to be remembered as an enabler or an executioner of press freedom.
Israeli rampage
21 Dec, 2024

Israeli rampage

ALONG with the genocide in Gaza, Israel has embarked on a regional rampage, attacking Arab and Muslim states with...