ISLAMABAD: In a surprising development, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday removed an Islamabad High Court (IHC) judge, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, as the election tribunal head for Islamabad.

The decision has been taken on applications filed by three PML-N leaders from Islam­abad who sought the transfer of election petitions against them to another tribunal.

The move has raised legal questions about whether the ECP can unilaterally remove a sitting judge appointed in consultation with the IHC chief justice.

The ECP, in three separate but identical orders annou­n­ced by a four-member bench headed by Chief Election Co­­m­­missioner Sikandar Sul­tan Raja, justified the move under Articles 218(3) and 10-A of the Constitution and Sections 3, 4 and 151 of the Elections Act.

The election petitions have now been transferred to the election tribunal for Raw­al­pi­ndi division, presided over by retired Justice Abdul Shakoor Paracha, who has been gran­ted jurisdiction over Islam­abad Capital Territory as well.

Transfers petitions against three PML-N lawmakers to tribunal led by retired judge

“The previous notification of the election tribunal comprising Justice Tariq Mehm­o­­od Jahangiri for the Islamabad Capital Territory is hereby wi­­th­­drawn. The office is directed to take follow-up action accordingly,” the orders said.

The decision is based on pleas filed by PML-N leaders Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry, Raja Khurram Nawaz and Anjum Aqeel Khan.

The respondents in the cases are PTI members Shoaib Shaheen, Syed Muhammad Ali Bokhari and Aamir Mughal.

One of the ECP orders cited a Lahore High Court judgement, which said that the concept of due process “rests in the idea that the legal proceedings be carried out in accordance with the established rules, express statutory provisions and settled principles for deciding the rights of litigants”.

The order highlighted that with the inclusion of Article 10-A in the Constitution through the 18th Amendment, a fair trial and due process are fundamental rights.

The order also mentioned an IHC order setting aside the ECP’s previous order of appointing the same retired judge, Abdul Shakoor Paracha, as tribunal head for Rawalpindi and Islamabad.

It said the only ground for the decision was that the ECP had proceeded in haste.

It said that the court also mentioned that the power of transfer was supervisory and administrative and must be exercised after providing an opportunity to every person concerned.

“No other ground has been mentioned by the high court for setting aside the order of the Commission. In the present case, which is the second round of litigation, the Commission has provided ample opportunity to the parties to defend their stance by filing additional grounds, written replies, amended replies and extensive arguments.”

Published in Dawn, December 4th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

At heat’s mercy
Updated 28 Apr, 2025

At heat’s mercy

The current heatwave is a dire warning of what lies ahead if Pakistan fails to confront the realities of climate change.
Culture war
28 Apr, 2025

Culture war

THE heightened tensions between India and Pakistan have sealed the fate of Abir Gulaal. Slated for a May release and...
Haj mismanagement
28 Apr, 2025

Haj mismanagement

THE relevant authorities in Pakistan are often blamed for negligence and poor management when it comes to Haj...
From gains to gaps
27 Apr, 2025

From gains to gaps

AS we mark World Immunisation Week 2025 — themed ‘Immunisation for All is Humanly Possible’ — we are faced...
Crisis talks
Updated 28 Apr, 2025

Crisis talks

Sense needs to be restored so that the Pahalgam attack may be independently investigated and the victims given justice.
BYC women in jail
27 Apr, 2025

BYC women in jail

THE detained Baloch Yakjehti Committee leader Mahrang Baloch and other BYC activists, including women, are reported...