AJK unrest

Published December 6, 2024

THERE is trouble brewing in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, where a coalition comprising various civil society organisations and backed by some political parties has been able to pull off another successful strike, this time against a controversial ordinance seeking to ‘regulate’ public gatherings. For context, last month, AJK President Barrister Sultan Mehmood had approved a presidential ordinance that imposed draconian punishments for ‘illegal’ public gatherings, rallies, and protests. It was similar to the law to regulate public assembly in Islamabad, issued by the federal government in September, called the Public Order and Peaceful Assembly Act of 2024. Under both laws, the administrative apparatus was given unprecedented powers to approve or deny permission to public gatherings and to impose severe punishments in case of non-compliance. Yesterday, the AJK public responded positively to the strike call despite an AJK supreme court injunction suspending the said ordinance two days earlier, ignoring the territorial government’s many exhortations for business to continue as usual.

It appears that the people of AJK feel quite strongly about measures taken to control their liberties, and the strike’s success suggests a bigger confrontation may be brewing. According to a strike organiser, “Our campaign is for the fundamental rights of the citizens of this state, which this law compromises. A peaceful strike will send a loud and clear message about the people’s commitment to civil liberties.” While the ordinance has been suspended, the coalition says it wants it repealed in full. It may be recalled that the same coalition, the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee, had also held large protests earlier this year, which ultimately forced the territorial government to accede to its demands. The trend is worrying, as it appears that attempts to exert control on the liberated territory have been triggering strong responses from the AJK public. Decision-makers would be well advised to proceed with caution, given the sensitivities involved, and to address local concerns with restraint.

Published in Dawn, December 6th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Taking cover
Updated 09 Jan, 2025

Taking cover

IT is unfortunate that, instead of taking ownership of important decisions, our officials usually seem keener to ...
A living hell
09 Jan, 2025

A living hell

WHAT Donald Trump does domestically when he enters the White House in just under two weeks is frankly the American...
A right denied
09 Jan, 2025

A right denied

DESPITE citizens possessing the constitutional and legal right to access it, federal ministries are failing to...
Closed doors
Updated 08 Jan, 2025

Closed doors

The nation’s fate has been decided through secret deals for too long, with the result that the citizenry has become increasingly alienated from the state.
Debt burden
08 Jan, 2025

Debt burden

THE federal government’s total debt stock soared by above 11pc year-over-year to Rs70.4tr at the end of November,...
GB power crisis
08 Jan, 2025

GB power crisis

MASS protests are not a novelty in Pakistan, and when the state refuses to listen through the available channels —...