Apex court upholds decisions under 26th Amendment

Published December 20, 2024 Updated December 20, 2024 10:48am

• Constitutional bench dismisses plea for deferment of appeals against military trials
• Explains why it fined ex-CJP Khawaja

ISLAMABAD: The Sup­r­e­­me Court has ruled that decisions made by courts of comp­e­­­tent jurisdiction remain valid and protected even if constitutional amendments or legislation are later declared invalid.

The observation — which came to justify why the court imposed a fine of Rs20,000 on Dec 9 on an application by former chief justice of Pakistan (CJP) Jawwad S. Khawaja — was made by a seven-member constitutional bench, headed by Justice Aminud Din Khan.

Mr Khawaja’s application sought to defer hearings on intra-court appeals (ICAs) challenging the trial of civilians by military courts until the constitutional validity of the 26th Amendment was determined. But the court rejected the plea as frivolous, imposing a fine of Rs20,000.

In its five-page order issued on Thursday, the bench expressed surprise over the argument presented by the petitioner’s counsel, describing it as lacking merit.

The bench then asked the counsel whether any Supreme Court existed in Pakistan today. The counsel admitted that it was in existence and he was before the Supreme Court. The order said the present Supreme Court was working in accordance with the Constitution, as amended through the 26th Amendment.

The court said it had gone through the record and it transpired that out of the seven-member constitutional bench hearing these appeals, six judges were members of the earlier regular bench hearing the appeals since the 26th Amendment came into force on Oct 21, 2024.

“We have seen that even previous to that, the respondent side was resisting the hearing of the appeals,” the order regretted, adding that even on behalf of the applicant, the formation of the bench was objected to.

Thereafter, when seven-member bench was constitu­ted by the three-judge Com­mittee under Section 2(1) of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, the applicant was satisfied with the seven-member bench.

Published in Dawn, December 20th, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....
Madressah oversight
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Madressah oversight

Bill should be reconsidered and Directorate General of Religious Education, formed to oversee seminaries, should not be rolled back.
Kurram’s misery
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Kurram’s misery

The state must recognise that allowing such hardship to continue undermines its basic duty to protect citizens’ well-being.
Hiking gas rates
19 Dec, 2024

Hiking gas rates

IMPLEMENTATION of a new Ogra recommendation to increase the gas prices by an average 8.7pc or Rs142.45 per mmBtu in...