US Supreme Court upholds law banning TikTok

Published January 18, 2025
LEBANESE Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri (left), President Joseph Aoun (second right) and outgoing Prime Minister Najib Mikati (right) meet French President Emmanuel Macron at the presidential palace in Baabda,  near Beirut, on Friday.—Reuters
LEBANESE Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri (left), President Joseph Aoun (second right) and outgoing Prime Minister Najib Mikati (right) meet French President Emmanuel Macron at the presidential palace in Baabda, near Beirut, on Friday.—Reuters

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court upheld on Friday a law banning TikTok in the United States on national security grounds if its Chinese parent company ByteDance does not sell the short-video app by Sunday, as the justices in a 9-0 decision declined to rescue a platform used by about half of all Americans.

The justices ruled that the law, passed by an overwhelming bipartisan majority in Congress last year and signed by President Joe Biden, did not violate the US constitution’s First Amendment protection against government abridgment of free speech. The justices affirmed a lower court’s decision that had upheld the measure after it was challenged by TikTok, ByteDance and some of the app’s users.

“There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok’s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary,” the court said in the unsigned opinion.

The court added that “we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners’ First Amendment rights”.

Judges rule that the law does not violate the constitution’s protection of free speech

A statement issued by the White House suggested that President Biden would not take any action to save TikTok before the law’s Sunday deadline for divestiture. Republican Donald Trump, who opposed a TikTok ban, succeeds Biden on Monday.

“The Supreme Court decision was expected, and everyone must respect it,” Trump said in a social media post. “My decision on TikTok will be made in the not too distant future, but I must have time to review the situation. Stay tuned!”

The court’s unanimity underscored the acceptance by the justices of the national security risks that Biden’s administration cited concerning TikTok, the court said, blunting apprehensions over free speech infringements.

“TikTok’s scale and susceptibility to foreign adversary control, together with the vast swaths of sensitive data the platform collects, justify differential treatment to address the government’s national security concerns,” the court said in the opinion.

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in a statement reiterated Biden’s position that “TikTok should remain available to Americans, but simply under American ownership or other ownership that addresses the national security concerns identified by Congress in developing this law”.

Given the timing, Jean-Pierre added, action to implement the law “must fall to the next administration”.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew will attend Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday, seated among other high-profile invitees. TikTok plans to shut US operations of the app on Sunday barring a last-minute reprieve, people familiar with the matter said.

Without a decision by Biden to formally invoke a 90-day delay in the deadline, companies providing services to TikTok or hosting the app could face legal liability. It is not immediately clear if TikTok’s business partners including Apple , Alphabet’s Google and Oracle will continue doing business with it before Trump is inaugurated. The uncertainty leaves open the possibility of a shutdown by TikTok on Sunday.

The law bars providing certain services to TikTok and other foreign adversary-controlled apps. including by offering it through app stores such as Apple and Google.

Published in Dawn, January 18th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Canal unrest
03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.