KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition filed against the appointment of the chief justice of Pakistan.

Some lawyers have petitioned the SHC and submitted that Justice Yahya Afridi had been appointed as the top judge of the country in October 2024 for a term of three years bypassing two senior most judges of the apex court.

A two-judge SHC bench comprising Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Justice Arshad Hussain Khan dismissed the petition after a preliminary hearing.

Citing the ministry of law, justice & parliamentary affairs, Special Parliamentary Committee and CJP Afridi as respondents, petitioners Wajahat Ali and five other lawyers asked the SHC to declare the impugned appointment ultra vires to the Constitution.

Bench says no provision exists in constitutional scheme to provide ‘reasons’ for the selection of the country’s top judge

The petitioners stated that no reason was given by the Special Parliamentary Committee for bypassing senior most judges of the Supreme Court while nominating Justice Afridi as CJP.

Petitioners’ lawyer Ebrahim Saifuddin argued that previously, the presidents had always adhered to the constitutional convention of appointing the senior most judge as the CJP while after 18th Amendment to the Constitution this long-standing convention was entrenched vide Article 175A (3).

However, he maintained that after 26th Amendment, a 12-member Special Parliamentary Committee comprising eight MNAs and four senators was tasked with nominating the CJP among the three senior most judges of the apex court. The committee had picked Justice Afridi, who was at Serial No.3 on the seniority list superseding Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar, the counsel added.

He argued that the committee did not establish any criteria for assessing, evaluating or determining the fitness of three senior most judges nor any valid reason was given for ignoring the two senior most judges.

The bench remarked that presently, there appeared to be no such provision in the constitutional scheme to provide reason in respect of the appointment of the CJP.

The petitioners submitted that in the past senior most judges were bypassed in the appointment of Justice Sajjad Ali Shah as the CJP, and the Supreme Court had declared the appointment unconstitutional.

Published in Dawn, January 22th, 2025

Opinion

Revival? For whom?

Revival? For whom?

Numerous sets of numbers, not quoted by govt sources, suggest that things are not as dazzling as claimed by those who run the country.

Editorial

Premature alarm
Updated 20 Feb, 2025

Premature alarm

Improvement in headline inflation gives policymakers chance to fix investment policies, implement structural reforms.
Forsaken province
20 Feb, 2025

Forsaken province

AND the endless cycle of violence continues. The brutal killing on Tuesday night of seven Punjab-bound passengers in...
In poor health
20 Feb, 2025

In poor health

THE absence of decent and affordable healthcare in the country continues to ruin lives. An example of this is ...
Out of control
Updated 19 Feb, 2025

Out of control

AS bodies continue to fall in Kurram despite a state-sanctioned ceasefire, one wonders how long local militants’...
Hollow words
19 Feb, 2025

Hollow words

IT is not uncommon for politicians to resort to the use of hyperbole in order to boost their public standing. ...
Migration matters
19 Feb, 2025

Migration matters

THE grass, it seems, did appear greener on the other side to millions of people as evidenced by the latest UN ...