PESHAWAR: Peshawar Bar Association on Thursday moved Peshawar High Court against different provisions of the provincial law empowering National database and Registration Authority to issue letters of administration and succession certificates.

The PBA through its president Amjid Ali Khan Marwat filed a petition in the high court requesting to declare as unconstitutional provisions of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate Act 2021 through which civil courts were barred from exercising jurisdiction in the subject and the law was given overriding effect on other laws in the field.

The petitioner contended that section 10 and 12 of the act were unreasonable and against fundamental rights guaranteed in Constitution.

The petitioner has also sought interim relief requesting the court to suspend operation over the said provisions till final disposal of the petition.

The petition was filed through advocates Zahidullah Zahid, Iftikhar Hussain Samandar and Izharullah.

The respondents in the petition are: KP government through the chief secretary, provincial law secretary and Nadra through its chairman.

The petitioner stated that the provincial government had enacted the KP Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate Act in 2021 by virtue of which the letters of administration and succession certificates were made to be issued by the Nadra. It was added that under section 4 of the act a succession facilitation unit was established within Nadra for the required task.

The petitioner stated that under the said law the relevant rules were framed through which a complicated mechanism and forms were introduced along with a hefty fee structure.

The petiti0oenr stated that under the prevailing law no court fee, etc was required to be paid for such like certificates if obtained through courts, hence charging a hefty amount in the garb of services charges was not only illegal but exploitative.

It was stated that apart from making the process complicated and expensive, the jurisdiction of courts were also barred under section 10 and the act was also given overriding effect under section 12.

The petitioner claimed that the said two provisions were also in conflict with several of the provisions of the same law including section 5(B) and section 8.

Published in Dawn, January 24th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

IMF scrutiny
Updated 11 Feb, 2025

IMF scrutiny

Strengthening foundations of the economic superstructure will help make the economy competitive and boost growth.
Shadow voices
11 Feb, 2025

Shadow voices

OVER the weekend, another ‘open letter’ addressed to the army chief and attributed to former prime minister ...
Paradise at a premium
11 Feb, 2025

Paradise at a premium

PAKISTAN’S recent triumph at the New York Travel and Adventure Show 2025, winning the Best Partner Pavilion Award,...
A positive note
Updated 10 Feb, 2025

A positive note

With govt unable to press growth accelerator without upending fragile recovery, sufferings of low-middle-income households are unlikely to disappear soon.
Justice for all
10 Feb, 2025

Justice for all

ALONG with his domestic agenda, Donald Trump is busy ripping to shreds the post-World War II ‘rules-based...
Held back
10 Feb, 2025

Held back

IT is a crying shame how women are conspicuously absent from Pakistan’s civil services. Despite comprising half ...