PESHAWAR: Peshawar Bar Association on Thursday moved Peshawar High Court against different provisions of the provincial law empowering National database and Registration Authority to issue letters of administration and succession certificates.

The PBA through its president Amjid Ali Khan Marwat filed a petition in the high court requesting to declare as unconstitutional provisions of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate Act 2021 through which civil courts were barred from exercising jurisdiction in the subject and the law was given overriding effect on other laws in the field.

The petitioner contended that section 10 and 12 of the act were unreasonable and against fundamental rights guaranteed in Constitution.

The petitioner has also sought interim relief requesting the court to suspend operation over the said provisions till final disposal of the petition.

The petition was filed through advocates Zahidullah Zahid, Iftikhar Hussain Samandar and Izharullah.

The respondents in the petition are: KP government through the chief secretary, provincial law secretary and Nadra through its chairman.

The petitioner stated that the provincial government had enacted the KP Letters of Administration and Succession Certificate Act in 2021 by virtue of which the letters of administration and succession certificates were made to be issued by the Nadra. It was added that under section 4 of the act a succession facilitation unit was established within Nadra for the required task.

The petitioner stated that under the said law the relevant rules were framed through which a complicated mechanism and forms were introduced along with a hefty fee structure.

The petiti0oenr stated that under the prevailing law no court fee, etc was required to be paid for such like certificates if obtained through courts, hence charging a hefty amount in the garb of services charges was not only illegal but exploitative.

It was stated that apart from making the process complicated and expensive, the jurisdiction of courts were also barred under section 10 and the act was also given overriding effect under section 12.

The petitioner claimed that the said two provisions were also in conflict with several of the provisions of the same law including section 5(B) and section 8.

Published in Dawn, January 24th, 2025

Opinion

Revival? For whom?

Revival? For whom?

Numerous sets of numbers, not quoted by govt sources, suggest that things are not as dazzling as claimed by those who run the country.

Editorial

Premature alarm
Updated 20 Feb, 2025

Premature alarm

Improvement in headline inflation gives policymakers chance to fix investment policies, implement structural reforms.
Forsaken province
20 Feb, 2025

Forsaken province

AND the endless cycle of violence continues. The brutal killing on Tuesday night of seven Punjab-bound passengers in...
In poor health
20 Feb, 2025

In poor health

THE absence of decent and affordable healthcare in the country continues to ruin lives. An example of this is ...
Out of control
Updated 19 Feb, 2025

Out of control

AS bodies continue to fall in Kurram despite a state-sanctioned ceasefire, one wonders how long local militants’...
Hollow words
19 Feb, 2025

Hollow words

IT is not uncommon for politicians to resort to the use of hyperbole in order to boost their public standing. ...
Migration matters
19 Feb, 2025

Migration matters

THE grass, it seems, did appear greener on the other side to millions of people as evidenced by the latest UN ...