Death blow

Published January 30, 2025

JOURNALISTS took to the streets in protest; human rights groups warned against the dangers; and digital rights experts cried themselves hoarse. But it all fell on deaf ears.

And now, after the president’s assent, the Peca amendments have become law, dealing democracy what might as well be termed a death blow. The haste with which this has occurred is astounding. Civil society pleaded for consultations, for a pause, for a moment of reflection. They were met with silence. Now, as the ink dries on this draconian law, the chilling effect on free expression is already setting in. The new law introduces Section 26(A), criminalising so-called fake news — a term left deliberately vague — subjecting individuals to up to three years in prison or fines of up to Rs2m. But what constitutes fake news? Who decides what information is “likely to cause fear, panic, or unrest”? As history has repeatedly shown, such ambiguities do not lend themselves to fair application. The PPP’s support for the legislation marks a spectacular ideological somersault that would score perfect tens in any gymnastics competition. Having once championed press freedom, the party now appears to believe that the best way to protect democracy is to strangle it. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar’s distinction between “working journalists” and citizens who “just pull out their phones” suggests a touching nostalgia for an era when news travelled by horseback.

The government’s claims that these amendments are meant to protect citizens hardly sound sincere. In fact, the establishment of a new National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency and the Social Media Protection and Regulatory Authority makes clear its true intent: unprecedented control over Pakistan’s digital space. This law extends beyond curtailing dissent — it seeks to erase it altogether. It should never have been passed. The government had an opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue, to strengthen media regulations through fair and transparent mechanisms, and to counter disinformation without trampling on fundamental rights. Instead, it chose coercion over consultation. Pakistan’s journalists, digital activists, and ordinary citizens must now prepare for a long battle against a law designed to silence them. The question is: will the courts, the last line of defence for civil liberties, stand up to this legislative overreach? The answer may well determine the future of free speech in the country.

Published in Dawn, January 30th, 2025

Opinion

The price of chocolate

The price of chocolate

Little attention is paid to any long-term strategy which might prevent vulnerable children from working in homes where they are in danger.

Editorial

Cholistan project
Updated 18 Feb, 2025

Cholistan project

GPI goals align with Pakistan's broader economic aims but the manner in which the initiative was launched raises questions.
Right to know
18 Feb, 2025

Right to know

IT is an unfortunate paradox that while on paper Pakistan has some of the most impressive right to information laws,...
Dam dispute
18 Feb, 2025

Dam dispute

THE situation in Chilas needs attention and a fair-minded approach so that it can be resolved amicably. Diamer ...
Climate funding gap
Updated 17 Feb, 2025

Climate funding gap

Pakistan must boost its institutional capacity to develop bankable climate projects.
UN monitoring report
Updated 17 Feb, 2025

UN monitoring report

Pakistan must press Kabul diplomatically over its tolerance of TTP terrorism.
Tax policy reform
17 Feb, 2025

Tax policy reform

THE cabinet’s decision to create a Tax Policy Office at the finance ministry has raised hopes that tax policy is...