• President approves transfers from Lahore, Sindh, Balochistan high courts
• Justices Dogar, Soomro, Asif may take charge tomorrow

ISLAMABAD: Presi­dent Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday transferred three judges from as many high courts to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), a day after five IHC judges had opposed the move in a letter sent to the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).

According to a notification issued by the Min­istry of Law and Justice, the president under Clause (1) of Article 200 of Constitution transferred Justice Moham­mad Sarfraz Dogar of the Lahore High Court, Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro of the Sindh High Court and Justice Mohammad Asif of the Balochistan High Court to the IHC.

The transfer order was issued after the pre­sident’s consultations with the CJP and the concurrence of all high courts’ chief justices.

The judges also gave consent for their transfer to the IHC. After their tra­nsfer, they are likely to join the IHC on Mon­day and the IHC administration has alre­ady prepared three courtrooms for the new judges.

A day earlier, five out of ten IHC judges had opposed the transfer of a LHC judge in a letter sent to the CJP, chief justices of the IHC, LHC, and SHC that a judge from another court was being transferred for his onwards elevation as the IHC chief justice.

The incumbent IHC CJ, Aamer Farooq, is the most senior chief justice and is likely to be elevated to the Supreme Court. The Judi­cial Com­mission of Pakis­tan has convened a meeting to consider high court judges for eight vacancies in the apex court.

The letter was signed by justices Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Babar Sattar, Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, and Saman Rafat Imtiaz. Inter­estingly, while the names of justices Miangul Aurangzeb and Arbab Tahir were also included in the letter, it did not bear their signatures.

The justices argued that the transfer of a judge from one high court to another is governed by Article 200, which required consultation between the president, CJP, and the chief justices of both the transferring and receiving high courts.

Earlier, three LHC judges — Sardar Moham­mad Aslam, Justice M. Bilal Khan, and Iqbal Hameedur Rehman — were transferred to the IHC and appointed as chief justices.

Furthermore, the letter highlighted that since the passage of the 18th Amendment in 2010, no permanent high court transfers had taken place, reinforcing the autonomy of each high court. A central concern raised by the IHC justices was that a transferred judge would be required to take a fresh oath under Article 194, which would place them at the bottom of the seniority list within the IHC.

This would render them ineligible for immediate consideration for the chief justice position, contradicting the JCP Appo­intment Rules 2024, which mandate that the CJ of a high court must be appo­i­nted from among the three senior judges of that court.

‘Fraud on Constitution’

The justices argued that transferring a judge solely to appoint them as chief justice would be a “fraud on the Constit­u­tion” and an attempt to bypass the established appointment mechanism under Article 175A.

The letter further challenged the rationale behind the transfer, citing the recent increase in the number of judges at the IHC from 10 to 12 under the IHC (Amendment) Act, 2024. It pointed out that the LHC was already understaffed, with only 35 out of 60 judicial positions filled, compared to 10 out of 12 positions occupied in the IHC. Seemingly, the five judges forgot the sanctioned strength of IHC is 13. Last year, the government passed a bill to increase the number from 10 to 13.

The bill stated: “In view of the consistent increase in the litigation in Islamabad and as it is growing into a cultural and business hub and also it is evident from the growth of population in Islamabad that further litigation will burden the High Court, so it is imperative that number of judges in Islamabad High Court may be increased. In light of the above, it is proposed to increase the number of judges in the Islamabad High Court from nine to twelve, in addition to the chief justice.”

Published in Dawn, February 2nd, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

At heat’s mercy
Updated 28 Apr, 2025

At heat’s mercy

The current heatwave is a dire warning of what lies ahead if Pakistan fails to confront the realities of climate change.
Culture war
28 Apr, 2025

Culture war

THE heightened tensions between India and Pakistan have sealed the fate of Abir Gulaal. Slated for a May release and...
Haj mismanagement
28 Apr, 2025

Haj mismanagement

THE relevant authorities in Pakistan are often blamed for negligence and poor management when it comes to Haj...
From gains to gaps
27 Apr, 2025

From gains to gaps

AS we mark World Immunisation Week 2025 — themed ‘Immunisation for All is Humanly Possible’ — we are faced...
Crisis talks
Updated 28 Apr, 2025

Crisis talks

Sense needs to be restored so that the Pahalgam attack may be independently investigated and the victims given justice.
BYC women in jail
27 Apr, 2025

BYC women in jail

THE detained Baloch Yakjehti Committee leader Mahrang Baloch and other BYC activists, including women, are reported...