LAHORE: The federal government’s proposed ban on 12 key agrochemical active ingredients has sparked concerns in Pakistan’s agricultural sector.

The decision, made in the 62nd APTAC meeting held the other day following the interception of rice export consignments over complaints of higher-than-permitted levels of chemical residue, was taken without consulting stakeholders or following statutory procedures. Industry experts fear this ban will harm crop production, raise costs for farmers, and discourage future investment in Pakistan’s agriculture.

Pakistan’s pesticide regulations clearly stipulate that active ingredients can only be banned based on the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHP) categories 1a and 1b, as well as Annexure III of the Rotterdam Convention.

“This decision appears to be based on non-scientific grounds, lacking consideration of residue management strategies employed by other countries. The issue at hand is not inherently related to the pesticides themselves but rather their misuse or off-label application. Therefore, emphasizing correct usage and handling practices is crucial to mitigating these challenges,” says Rashid Ahmed, executive director of CropLife Pakistan, in a statement.

Addressing pesticide residues in rice exports is crucial, but implementing a blanket ban is a hasty decision that fails to address the underlying problem, he asserts.

He warns that the ban would impact wheat, cotton, fruit, and vegetable growers, leading to reduced yields, increased costs, and potential food security risks due to limited alternatives and accelerated pest resistance.

It will also damage investor confidence in Pakistan’s regulatory environment, he adds.

He says the main problem is improper pesticide use and storage, not the pesticides themselves, as 50 percent of residue issues stem from mishandling in grain storage facilities.

He appeals to the prime minister and the National Food Security & Research Ministry to reconsider the ban and work together on a science-based approach.

Published in Dawn, March 13th, 2025

Must Read

Ukraine, Nato and the future of Europe

Ukraine, Nato and the future of Europe

The spectacle of the verbal spat between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Vlodomyr Zelensky in the Oval Office was stark evidence of a tectonic shift in longstanding US foreign policy on Ukraine, Russia, Europe and Nato.

Opinion

Editorial

After the review
Updated 16 Mar, 2025

After the review

Should prepare economy for durable growth by attracting foreign private investments to boost productivity and exports.
Embracing crypto
16 Mar, 2025

Embracing crypto

IT seems a little prod was all it took for Pakistan to finally ‘embrace the future’. The Pakistan Crypto Council...
Fault lines
16 Mar, 2025

Fault lines

IT was a distressing spectacle, though a sadly predictable one. As the National Assembly took up for discussion the...
Revised solar policy
Updated 15 Mar, 2025

Revised solar policy

Criticism policy revisions misplaced as these will increase payback periods for consumers with oversized solar systems.
Toxic prejudice
15 Mar, 2025

Toxic prejudice

WITH far-right movements on the march across the world, it is no surprise that anti-Muslim bias is witnessing high...
Children in jails
15 Mar, 2025

Children in jails

PAKISTAN’S children in prison have often been treated like adult criminals. The Sindh government’s programme to...