Inheritance rights

Published March 21, 2025 Updated 3 days ago

THE Federal Shariat Court’s ruling that it is un-Islamic to deprive a woman of her right to inheritance is a watershed moment in Pakistan’s struggle for gender equality. For generations, women across the country have been systematically denied what is rightfully theirs, through coercion, social pressure and outright criminality. Although clear religious injunctions, as well as legal protections exist, numerous exploitative customs rob women of their share in property. The most common of these is haq bakhshwana, where women are forced to sign away their inheritance in favour of male relatives. In order to keep the property within the family, many women are married to their paternal cousins or forced into exchange marriages (watta satta). In extreme cases, women are symbolically ‘married’ to the Quran to permanently exclude them from any inheritance — an appalling distortion of religious beliefs. Women who insist on claiming their inheritance face threats, social stigma, or even violence. They may be labelled as greedy or disloyal and accused of breaking family ties. Some families sever ties with daughters or sisters who demand their share, making it an emotionally and socially costly battle.

The law, in theory, is clear. The Muslim Personal Law (1961) guarantees women their inheritance, and Section 498-A of the Pakistan Penal Code criminalises depriving women of their property rights. Additionally, the Enforcement of Women’s Property Rights Act (2020) was passed to facilitate women in reclaiming their inheritance. Yet, these legal provisions remain largely ineffective due to weak enforcement, judicial delays, and cultural resistance. Now, with the FSC’s unequivocal ruling, the state must take concrete steps to enforce these laws. A comprehensive awareness campaign should educate citizens about both the religious validity and legal protection of women’s inheritance rights. Law-enforcement agencies must be sensitised to treat instances of inheritance deprivation as criminal cases, rather than private family disputes. The judiciary should establish specialised tribunals to expedite inheritance cases. Government departments should monitor inheritance transfers, especially in areas where exploitative customs are prevalent, to ensure compliance with the law. The FSC’s judgement invoking “Amr bil Maroof Wa Nahi Anil Munkar” (enjoining good and forbidding wrong) as a state duty under the Enforcement of Sharia Act is particularly significant. It places responsibility on government institutions to actively protect women’s rights rather than remain passive observers.

Published in Dawn, March 21st, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Judicial disputes
Updated 23 Mar, 2025

Judicial disputes

Public perceptions of the institution’s independence and neutrality have taken a hit due to bitter, public spats between senior judges.
Biased proposal
23 Mar, 2025

Biased proposal

PAKISTAN’S tax system is extortionist, unpredictable and unsupportive of investment and economic growth. It...
JFK files
23 Mar, 2025

JFK files

THE latest cache of declassified documents from what are known as the ‘Kennedy files’ have not really impressed...
Running on empty
Updated 22 Mar, 2025

Running on empty

World Water Day should remind country’s rulers that water crisis threatens the very survival of our future generations.
Another ultimatum
22 Mar, 2025

Another ultimatum

THESE are fraught times, but the government must still find it in its heart to be a little more accommodating....
Muzzled voices
22 Mar, 2025

Muzzled voices

A NEW era of censorship is upon us. The FIA’s arrest of journalist and founder of media agency Raftar, Farhan...