Visa criteria

Published March 26, 2025 Updated a day ago

MANY South Asians who migrated to Western countries in pursuit of a better future expected to live in a just and fair society. While there may be some truth to this in a relative sense, the policies of these nations still carry traces of colon-ialism in various aspects of life; whether in employment, the justice system, or even visit visas.

A glaring example is the treatment of visit visa applications for Canada from countries like Pakistan, even if the applicant is sponsored by a Canadian citizen relative. The reasons for rejection are often so absurd that one wonders whether the application was even reviewed properly. Even a close family member’s wedding is not considered a valid reason for approval. However, rather than blaming individual visa officers, it is the system itself that embodies this colonial arro-gance; one that assumes that applicants from certain countries are unscrupulous unless they can prove otherwise, often based on subjective and arbitrary criteria.

This discriminatory approach has deep historical roots, stemming from a colonial mindset that once viewed non-white individuals as commodities to be exploited for economic gain.

Today, the immigration policies of these Western nations operate on a similar principle: they welcome immigrants, who are highly educated and skilled, indivi-duals whose education was funded by their home countries, because they provide economic benefits to the host nation. Besides, in financial terms, such immig-rants have a ‘positive net present value’.

That said, we cannot attribute all our struggles to external forces. Had South Asian nations, including Pakistan, managed their affairs better, many of us would not have needed to migrate in the first place.

Even those who moved abroad would have had the option to return, rather than being subjected to policies that keep families divided.

The Western countries may not resemble authoritarian regimes, like the one in North Korea, in their methods, but in effect, they achieve similar results, where one wields a gun, the other wields a pen.

Shakeel Nizamani
Calgary, Canada

Published in Dawn, March 26th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Some progress
Updated 27 Mar, 2025

Some progress

The hard-won macroeconomic stability is only a short distance away from a deeper crisis.
Time to talk
27 Mar, 2025

Time to talk

IN an encouraging development, the government has signalled openness to PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s ...
Black Sea truce
27 Mar, 2025

Black Sea truce

WHILE the Trump administration may have no problem with Israel renewing its rampage in Gaza, it is playing ...
Kabul visit
Updated 26 Mar, 2025

Kabul visit

Islamabad should continue to emphasise that presence of terrorists on Afghan soil stands in the way of normal commercial ties.
Drought warning
26 Mar, 2025

Drought warning

DRIVEN by rising temperatures linked to climate change, increasing drought events across Pakistan have affected tens...
Deadly roads
26 Mar, 2025

Deadly roads

DESPITE daytime restrictions on heavy vehicles, Karachi continues to witness one horrific traffic accident after...