PHC grants interim relief to employees in suspension, transfer cases

Published Updated
0
The court was also requested to declare unconstitutional all relevant SROs and notifications amending the impugned rules. — APP/File
The court was also requested to declare unconstitutional all relevant SROs and notifications amending the impugned rules. — APP/File

BANNU: The Peshawar High Court’s Bannu Bench has granted interim relief in two cases challenging provincial departments’ powers to transfer, post, and suspend employees following the imposition of emergency and governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

A bench comprising Justice Sabitullah Khan and Justice Aurangzeb Khan heard petitions raising legal questions about the departments’ authority to exercise such powers in districts designated under the federal government’s orders.

The bench suspended the orders concerning the suspension of the Bannu regional municipal officer (RMO) and the transfer of an assistant director of the local government and rural development department, ruling that the status quo be maintained in both cases.

Bannu RMO Atiqur Rehman Baloch and assistant director Inamullah had filed petitions.

Their counsel, Pir Hameedullah Shah, contended that the President of Pakistan imposed an emergency and the governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on Oct 11 under the Constitution’s Articles 232 and 234. Subsequently, he stated the federal government had placed the administrative and operational control of 12 designated districts, including Bannu, under the area development secretariat (ADS) with the additional chief secretary as its administrator.

He stated that under the federal order, the authority to transfer and post provincial officials serving in the designated districts rested with the prime minister. However, he argued that despite these provisions, the secretary local government suspended RMO Baloch on Oct 30, while the local government and rural development department’s director general transferred assistant director Inamullah to the directorate general on Oct 15.

The petitioners’ counsel argued that the impugned orders had been issued in violation of the federal order and without approval from the competent authority, rendering them unlawful.

After considering the legal grounds in both petitions, the court issued pre-admission notices to the respondents, including the ADS administrator, the secretary and director general of local government and other relevant authorities, directing them to submit comments within two weeks.

The court also issued notices to Assistant Attorney General Taj Mohammad Khan and Additional Advocate General Zahidul Haq, seeking their assistance at the next hearing.

As interim relief, the court ordered that the existing position in both cases be maintained until a final decision is reached.

Published in Dawn, November 7th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

The debt burden
Updated 07 Nov, 2026

The debt burden

The government borrows to cover consumption, budget deficits, and external payments — not to build anything that pays for itself.
Expendable LGs
07 Nov, 2026

Expendable LGs

POLITICAL parties frequently appear reluctant to hold regular local bodies elections on one pretext or another. This...
Scam centres
07 Nov, 2026

Scam centres

THE recent raid by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency on a dubious call centre in Karachi shows how...
Reviewing ties
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Reviewing ties

With the Democrats clawing back power in Congress, changes in America’s approach to global engagement are likely to occur.
Genuine engagement
06 Nov, 2026

Genuine engagement

THE PTI-led opposition alliance TTAP appears to have finally brought an initially reluctant Maulana Fazlur Rahman on...
Human bondage
Updated 06 Nov, 2026

Human bondage

Law enforcement and political quarters are notorious for protecting the perpetrators, instead of ensuring legal implementation. Systemic coercion will keep Pakistan from becoming a humane state.