Consumer courts can’t hear insurance policyholder's complaints, LHC holds

Published Updated
0
A file photo of the Lahore High Court building. —LHC website/File
A file photo of the Lahore High Court building. —LHC website/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has ruled that consumer courts lack jurisdiction to entertain complaints filed by policyholders against insurance companies.

Justice Jawad Hassan issued the ruling on a petition filed by the United Insurance Company of Pakistan Limited against an order passed by the District Consumer Court in Bhakkar.

The consumer court had overruled an objection raised by the insurance firm regarding the maintainability of a complaint filed by a policyholder.

The district court had held that the complaint was maintainable simply because the dispute stemmed from the provision of insurance services.

Setting aside the consumer court’s order, Justice Hassan observed that the lower forum failed to properly examine the relevant statutory framework, specifically Section 122 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000.

The judge noted that Section 122(3) of the Ordinance explicitly bars any court other than a specialised tribunal from exercising jurisdiction over claims brought by a policyholder against an insurance company in respect of or arising out of an insurance policy.

Orders issuance of fresh, reasoned decision on case’s maintainability within a month

Referring to constitutional principles and settled judicial precedents, including the landmark Adamjee Insurance Company case, Justice Hassan highlighted that under Article 143 of the Constitution, competent federal legislation takes precedence over provincial enactments.

Consequently, he said, where a special statute provides a specific mechanism and forum for dispute resolution, general laws such as consumer protection acts cannot be invoked to displace the jurisdiction of the specialised tribunal.

The judge remanded the matter back to the consumer court with directions to re-examine the question of maintainability strictly in accordance with the law and binding judicial precedents. The judge said a fresh and reasoned decision should be issued within one month.

Published in Dawn, November 13th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Climate challenges
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Climate challenges

Pakistan cannot afford to confront its climate crises one disaster, one season and one international summit at a time.
Under fire
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Under fire

KP police are increasingly vulnerable as they play a frontline role in ongoing operations against terrorists.
Used car imports
13 Nov, 2026

Used car imports

THE government’s effort to restrict used car imports appears to be faltering. So suggest the numbers. Despite...
Iran status quo
Updated 12 Nov, 2026

Iran status quo

The US cannot hold the world hostage in order to find an honourable exit from a disastrous war for which it has only itself — and Israel — to blame.
Unspent funds
12 Nov, 2026

Unspent funds

THE slow pace of development spending shows how public investment continues to bear the brunt of efforts to create a...
Homes and hope
12 Nov, 2026

Homes and hope

THE completion of more than one million homes for families displaced by the 2022 floods is a moment worth...