Jemima says Benazir is no Suu Kyi

Published October 22, 2007

LONDON, Oct 21: Jemima Khan, former wife of Imran Khan has done a hatchet job on Benazir Bhutto in a devastating piece in Sunday Telegraph which is likely to have exactly the opposite effect on the PPP chairperson’s supporters than what the writer had perhaps intended to.

At the very outset, Ms Khan admits: “I am biased, I don’t like Benazir Bhutto. She called me names during her election campaign in 1996 and left a bitter taste. Petty personal grievances aside, I still find jubilant reports of her return to Pakistan depressing. Let’s be clear about this before she’s turned into a martyr.”

“This is no Aung San Suu Kyi, despite her repeated insistence that she’s fighting for democracy”, or even more incredibly, “fighting for Pakistan’s poor”.

“This is the woman who was twice dismissed on corruption charges. She went into self-imposed exile while investigations continued into millions she had allegedly stashed away into Swiss bank accounts ($1.5 billion by the reckoning of Musharraf’s own ‘National Accountability Bureau’).

“She has only been able to return because Musharraf, that megalomaniac, knows that his future depends on the grassroots diehard supporters inherited from her father’s party, the PPP.

“The Americans and the British are acutely aware that their strategy in the region is failing and that Musharraf’s hold on power is ever more tenuous. They have pressed hard for Benazir and the general to cut a deal that would allow them to share power for the next five years in a ‘liberal forces government’.

“In a country that tops the international corruption league, she was its most self-enriching leader.

“Benazir has always cynically used her gender to manipulate: I loved her answer to David Frost when he asked her how many millions she had in her Swiss bank accounts. ‘David, I think that’s a very sexist question’.

“A non sequitur (does loot have a gender?) but one that brought the uncomfortable line of questioning to a swift end.

“The problem is that the West never seems to learn; playing favourites in a complicated nation’s politics always backfires. Imposing Benazir on Pakistan is the opposite of democratic and doubtless will cause more chaos in an already unstable country.

“Make no mistake, Benazir may look the part, but she’s as ruthless and conniving as they come — a kleptocrat in a Hermes headscarf.”

Opinion

Editorial

Canal politics
Updated 20 Apr, 2025

Canal politics

The consequences of the state taking decisions without regard for its people can be seen yet again in the form of widespread restlessness and anger.
Lesser citizens
20 Apr, 2025

Lesser citizens

CAN the state ever turn the dream of communal harmony into reality? A slew of injustices torment Pakistan’s...
Winning spree
20 Apr, 2025

Winning spree

AFTER sealing qualification for the ICC Women’s World Cup, Pakistan skipper Fatima Sana immediately set her sights...
Deadlocked
Updated 19 Apr, 2025

Deadlocked

Politicians’ refusal to talk to each other and resolve issues has created space for a different type of rulership to take over.
Trump vs Harvard
19 Apr, 2025

Trump vs Harvard

AMONGST the ‘enemies of the people’ in Trumpian America are elite universities seen as the bastions of liberal...
External account stability
19 Apr, 2025

External account stability

DRIVEN by a major spike in workers’ remittances last month, the country’s current account posted a record ...