Jemima says Benazir is no Suu Kyi

Published October 22, 2007

LONDON, Oct 21: Jemima Khan, former wife of Imran Khan has done a hatchet job on Benazir Bhutto in a devastating piece in Sunday Telegraph which is likely to have exactly the opposite effect on the PPP chairperson’s supporters than what the writer had perhaps intended to.

At the very outset, Ms Khan admits: “I am biased, I don’t like Benazir Bhutto. She called me names during her election campaign in 1996 and left a bitter taste. Petty personal grievances aside, I still find jubilant reports of her return to Pakistan depressing. Let’s be clear about this before she’s turned into a martyr.”

“This is no Aung San Suu Kyi, despite her repeated insistence that she’s fighting for democracy”, or even more incredibly, “fighting for Pakistan’s poor”.

“This is the woman who was twice dismissed on corruption charges. She went into self-imposed exile while investigations continued into millions she had allegedly stashed away into Swiss bank accounts ($1.5 billion by the reckoning of Musharraf’s own ‘National Accountability Bureau’).

“She has only been able to return because Musharraf, that megalomaniac, knows that his future depends on the grassroots diehard supporters inherited from her father’s party, the PPP.

“The Americans and the British are acutely aware that their strategy in the region is failing and that Musharraf’s hold on power is ever more tenuous. They have pressed hard for Benazir and the general to cut a deal that would allow them to share power for the next five years in a ‘liberal forces government’.

“In a country that tops the international corruption league, she was its most self-enriching leader.

“Benazir has always cynically used her gender to manipulate: I loved her answer to David Frost when he asked her how many millions she had in her Swiss bank accounts. ‘David, I think that’s a very sexist question’.

“A non sequitur (does loot have a gender?) but one that brought the uncomfortable line of questioning to a swift end.

“The problem is that the West never seems to learn; playing favourites in a complicated nation’s politics always backfires. Imposing Benazir on Pakistan is the opposite of democratic and doubtless will cause more chaos in an already unstable country.

“Make no mistake, Benazir may look the part, but she’s as ruthless and conniving as they come — a kleptocrat in a Hermes headscarf.”

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...