Order against PCO reversed

Published November 7, 2007

ISLAMABAD, Nov 6: An eight-member Supreme Court bench headed by newly installed Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar on Tuesday overruled a seven-judge decision that had struck down the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) soon after its proclamation and declared that the earlier order should not be deemed to have been passed.

“The order is set aside and declared void, quorum non judice (without jurisdiction) and passed without lawful authority,” the court held.

The bench comprised Justice Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi, Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar, Justice M. Javed Buttar, Justice Ijazul Hassan, Justice Mohammad Qaim Jan Khan, Justice Mohammad Moosa K. Leghari and Justice Chaudhry Ijaz Yousaf.

The order came on an application of the government requesting the court to clarify that no order overturning the PCO had been passed by it and if there was such an order, it had no legal value or binding force.

The bench assembled soon after the oath-taking ceremony for four new judges to overrule the decision of the seven judges who have been removed from office under the PCO.

Justice Hassan and Justice Khan were elevated from the Peshawar High Court and Justice Leghari from the Sindh High Court, while Justice Yousaf is a former chief justice of the Federal Shariat Court.

The strength of the Supreme Court has now reached nine, compared to the earlier 19.

Acting Registrar of the Supreme Court Saara Saeed had stated on Nov 4 after publication of reports about the order striking down the PCO: “It is released for the information of all concerned that the rumour being spread that the Supreme Court has passed any order against the PCO is incorrect.”

The attorney-general argued that an unsigned order had been circulated in the press declaring that the PCO was illegal at a time when the members of the bench were not judges.

He brushed aside a perception in certain circles that martial law had been imposed, saying that the military had not taken over as the civilian governments were intact at the centre and in the provinces. The order by the seven judges had been passed without issuing notices to the petitioners, he said.

In the application, the government stated that the order published by newspapers had created confusion and had the potential of creating complications.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...