NEW DELHI, June 25: The Indian government and its communist allies on Wednesday failed to settle an impasse over a landmark nuclear deal with the United States, but decided to continue talks.

Faced with a choice of breaking with the communists and heading to early elections or abandoning the deal, the government chose to stall for more time.

“The committee completed its discussions on all aspects of the Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation agreement. The next meeting of the committee, to be convened in due course, will finalise its findings,” said Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee, reading from a terse statement after the meeting.

He declined to answer questions.

Mukherjee represented the governing Congress party at the hour-long talks with leaders of the communist parties and heads of several smaller members of the ruling coalition.

The nuclear deal would reverse three decades of American policy by allowing the shipment of atomic fuel and technology to India, which has not signed international non-proliferation accords and has tested nuclear weapons.

India, in exchange, would open its civilian reactors to international inspections.

The deal has faced stiff opposition from India’s communist parties, which don’t want to see New Delhi drawn closer to Washington.

The communists, who prop up the government from the outside, have threatened to withdraw their support if the current administration presses on with the nuclear pact, a move that could topple the government and lead to early elections.

For India to move ahead with the deal it needs to sign a separate deal with the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency that’s needed before the US Congress can approve the pact.

There was no change of heart from the communists after the talks.

“We will not allow this government to go for the IAEA board approval,” said Debabrata Biswas, a senior communist official who attended the meeting.

With no concessions from the communists, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh would be forced to either move forward without their support — a risky political move — or abandon the much touted nuclear agreement.—AP

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.