UNITED NATIONS, July 12: Russia and China on Friday vetoed a resolution backed by the US and Britain in the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on Zimbabwe for holding a presidential election that was boycotted by the opposition candidate.

The resolution would have imposed an arms embargo on Zimbabwe and slapped financial and travel restrictions on President Robert Mugabe and 13 other officials, and called for the appointment of a UN’s special envoy for the African country.

Nine countries voted for the US-drafted text; five, including Russia and China, opposed it and one abstained in the 15-nation council.

The result marked a failure by the western bloc to persuade Russia and China into at least abstaining from the vote, owing to the gravity of the crisis in Zimbabwe.

It also sparked angry exchanges between the big powers. A seething British Ambassador Johan Sawers said: “The key thing is that the Russians (had) decided to vote against it”. “The assessment here is that China would not have vetoed it on its own because they have a range of conflicting interests at stake.”

Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to the United Nations, was particularly harsh in his remarks about Russia, saying that Moscow had supported a joint statement criticising the situation in Zimbabwe by the G-8 leaders at their meeting in Japan earlier this week. “The U-turn in the Russian position is particularly surprising and disturbing,” Mr Khalilzad said, adding it had raised questions about Moscow’s reliability as a partner.

Opponents of the resolution, which included South Africa, Libya and Vietnam, argued that Zimbabwe was not a threat to international peace and security — the qualification for eliciting the council action.

They said imposing sanctions over an election was interference in Zimbabwe’s internal affairs. They said that ongoing talks in South Africa between the country’s ruling and opposition parties should be given a chance.

Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin responded that the resolution was “an ever more obvious attempt to take the council beyond its charter prerogatives and beyond maintaining international peace and security. We believe such practices to be illegitimate and dangerous.”

Before the vote, Chinese Ambassador Wang Guangya told reporters that Beijing could not accept the language of the resolution and wanted dialogue between Zimbabwe’s parties, “so to adopt such a resolution at this time would not be helpful.”

Zimbabwe’s Ambassador Boniface Chidyausiku observed after the vote that the Security Council had refused to be “intimidated” by Britain, former colonial ruler of Zimbabwe, and the United States. “The United Nations has stuck to the Charter,” he said.

Voting for the resolution were the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Croatia, Burkina Faso, Panama and Costa Rica. Indonesia abstained.

Opinion

Editorial

A hasty retreat
Updated 28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

Govt should not extend its campaign of violence against PTI and its leaders, thinking it now has the upper hand. Enough is enough.
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...