LAHORE, Aug 25: A former prime minister of Azad Kashmir is contacting All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) leaders in occupied Kashmir to discuss with them a schedule for a simultaneous march on the Line of Control from both sides to make it irrelevant and announce a “symbolic liberation” of the divided state.

Barrister Sultan Mahmood, who is president of the People’s Muslim League, told Dawn on Monday that LoC was just like what was once the Berlin Wall between East Germany and West Germany and would not be tolerated any more.

According to him, the APHC leaders of held Kashmir have agreed to his plan, but a schedule for the proposed march will be finalised after more consultations.

The former AJK prime minister said there was a need for fresh and simultaneous elections in both parts of Kashmir in the coming few months so that genuine representatives of the Kashmiri people could be elected. People taking part in the polls must get a mandate from their constituents to find a solution to the Kashmir dispute, he said.

The United Nations Human Rights Watch must supervise the polls to ensure their transparency and impartiality, he said.

He said the people elected as a result of such elections would be the genuine representatives of Kashmiri people and have a right to represent them in talks between Pakistan and India.

He said although Pakistan and India were parties to the Kashmir dispute, an ultimate solution to the dispute would not be possible unless the representatives of the Kashmiris were included in talks.

Replying to a question about the movement witnessed in occupied Kashmir these days, Barrister Sultan said it was “people’s revolution” which was stronger than the liberation struggle that had erupted in 1988-89.

He said in the past leaders had been leading the people, but this time it was the other way round. He said it was the people of occupied Kashmir who had brought the leaders out on the streets.

Asked why the APHC leaders were saying that the Kashmiris wanting liberation from India would also not like accession to Pakistan, the former prime minister said the leaders did not want to play any divisive role.

At present, he argued, people from all shades of opinion, including those who were in favour of an autonomous Kashmir, were taking part in the new phase of the liberation movement. And in case any leader talked of accession to Pakistan, those having a different opinion might think of parting ways.

Opinion

Editorial

When medicine fails
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

When medicine fails

Between now and 2050, medical experts expect antibiotic resistance to kill 40m people worldwide.
Nawaz on India
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

Nawaz on India

Nawaz Sharif’s hopes of better ties with India can only be realised when New Delhi responds to Pakistan positively.
State of abuse
18 Nov, 2024

State of abuse

DESPITE censure from the rulers and society, and measures such as helplines and edicts to protect the young from all...
Football elections
17 Nov, 2024

Football elections

PAKISTAN football enters the most crucial juncture of its ‘normalisation’ era next week, when an Extraordinary...
IMF’s concern
17 Nov, 2024

IMF’s concern

ON Friday, the IMF team wrapped up its weeklong unscheduled talks on the Fund’s ongoing $7bn programme with the...
‘Un-Islamic’ VPNs
Updated 17 Nov, 2024

‘Un-Islamic’ VPNs

If curbing pornography is really the country’s foremost concern while it stumbles from one crisis to the next, there must be better ways to do so.