BRUSSELS, Oct 13: Although the flurry of state rescues of banks in Europe is likely to weigh on public finances, many governments are hoping the moves will eventually pay off through dividends and other gains.

Following London’s leads, a growing number of European governments are lining up to set aside billions of euros in taxpayers’ money for propping up shell-shocked banks.

While the rescues will cost the public handsomely, governments will get new assets which they hope will eventually pay dividends or can be sold on at profit in the future.

“Everything depends on the purchase price and how prices develop afterwards,” said analyst Nicolas Veron at Brussels-based economics think-tank Bruegel.

“It’s not necessarily a bad investment for the governments,” remarked analyst Sylvain Broyer at French investment bank Natixis.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said that banks should suspend dividend payments to shareholders as long as they have not reimbursed the government.

Governments can look to the example set by Sweden in the early 1990s when it was hit by a deep crisis and banks were nationalised and later sold for a profit after their recovery.

The Swedish government remains the main shareholder of bank Nordea, Veron noted, remarking that “the money that is mobilised can be tied up for a long time.”

“It will take a long time for the banks’ shares to recover. However, the cost of doing nothing would have been infinitely greater,” said Mario Deaglio, an economics professor in Turin.

In the short term, European governments’ recently adopted rescue plans will only have a slight impact on public deficits, according to Bank of America economist Gilles Moec.

“Governments are going to issue new debt to take stakes in companies. At first it won’t show up. It’s the debt servicing that is going to weigh on the accounts, but only after a year or two,” he said.

To finance the rescue of Dexia and Fortis, Belgium for one is to borrow 12.9 billion euros which will add 500 million euros in annual interest payments.

Governments want to limit the impact on the public finances of plans to guarantee interbank lending by making banks pay for state support.

“We don’t want to hand a gift over to the bankers,” said Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker.

Nonetheless, the German government expects to have to pay five per cent of what it guarantees.

However, the burden of weaker economic activity on account of the financial crisis will probably cut deeper into public accounts than the cost of rescuing banks.

“Given the deterioration in the economic situation, there is going to be deterioration in the public finances,” said European Commission spokeswoman for economic matters Amelia Torres.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

IHK resolution
Updated 08 Nov, 2024

IHK resolution

If the BJP administration were to listen to Kashmiris, it could pave the way for the resumption of the political process in IHK.
Climate realities
08 Nov, 2024

Climate realities

THE Air Quality Index in Lahore once again shot past the 1,000-level mark on Wednesday morning, registering at an...
Rule by fear
08 Nov, 2024

Rule by fear

THE abduction of an opposition MNA, as claimed by PTI, is yet another grim episode in Pakistan’s ongoing crisis of...
Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...