N-deterrence prevents war: Kalam

Published June 20, 2002

NEW DELHI, June 19: Nuclear deterrence kept India and Pakistan from going to war, India’s President-in-waiting and author of the country’s “missile doctrine”, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, said on Wednesday, apparently unmindful of the fact that he had just endorsed President Pervez Musharraf’s controversial perspective on the issue.

Reaffirming India’s stated nuclear doctrine of ‘no first use,’ Kalam said that if India and Pakistan did not have nuclear weapons there would have been a war.

“Even the recent warfare would have seen that. Why it did not take place? If we did not have nuclear weapons it would have taken place. Do you understand that? This nuclear deterrent on both sides has helped not to engage in a big war and to avoid the nuclear war,” said Kalam.

There was no official comment on Kalam’s first news conference, although analysts said he had embarrassed the lobby that had promptly slammed Gen Musharraf’s remarks on the issue.

Gen Musharraf said on Monday that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal had brought “strategic balance” to South Asia and had prevented India from starting a “limited war”.

“Today’s heightened international concerns of a nuclear conflict in South Asia, and the hesitation, frustration and inability of India to attack Pakistan or conduct a so-called limited war, bear ample testimony to the fact that strategic balance exists in South Asia,” Gen Musharraf was quoted as saying.

The Pakistani president’s comments invited a summary criticism from India of Pakistani “nuclear blackmail”.

“The international community should not ignore such continued manifestations of Pakistani irresponsibility, loose talk and undiluted hostility towards India and the continued concoction of doomsday theory to justify Pakistan’s use of nuclear blackmail,” a foreign ministry spokesperson said on Tuesday.

Kalam, a self-styled nuclear hawk, has been supported by all major parties for the presidency except the leftist groups who have fielded a woman doctor and a freedom struggle veteran.

Captain Lakshmi Sehgal had marched with Subhash Chandra Bose as the head of the women’s unit of his Azad Hind Fauj.

Anti-nuclear peace activist Achin Vanaik said while the easing of the standoff was welcome, no time should be lost now to take measures against any future nuclear adventurism or even a highly possible nuclear accident by both sides.

“These measures should not however be seen as a substitute to nuclear disarmament, which is the only way of dispelling the fear of a holocaust that would otherwise continue to haunt the region,” Vanaik said.—J.N

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...