Indian nukes not safe

Published August 18, 2009

India tested its first atomic bomb in 1974 and until now it has almost 60 bombs and other nuclear weapons, but the security of Indian nuclear assets is highly questionable and dubious.

We find numerous cases in which top Indian companies had been criminally involved in the past in importing and exporting nuclear equipment. An American company, the Berkeley Nucleonic Corporation (BNC), was fined on transferring nuclear components to the Bhaba Atomic Research Centre in India. Similarly, two other Indian companies were also banned for selling missile goods and chemical arms' material to Iran. Even in 2005, Indian scientists Dr. Y.S. Prasad and Surrendar were blacklisted by the US, seeing that they were involved in nuclear theft. Likewise, a container packed with radioactive material was stolen from the Research Atomic Centre in India in 2006.

Similarly, another scientist belonging to Hindu extremist organisation RSS was engaged in transferring prohibited nuclear technology to Israel and other countries for getting funds for the completion of 'Maha Bharat agenda'. Two months ago, one more Indian nuclear scientist Lokanathan Mahalingam was mysteriously found dead in a lake.

Facts reveal that Indian nukes may fall into the hands of Hindu fundamentalist organisations like RSS, Bajrang Dal and others. Many separatist groups are fighting for their independence in 14 out of 28 states in India. If 10 militants can engage around 3,000 commandos, police and agencies in the November 2008 attack in Mumbai, India for 60 hours, then the question arises how safe are Indian nuclear assets? The answer not at all. These extremist groups can easily snatch nuclear weapons with the help of Indian scientists and can use them against the US, Europe or any other country for their benefit. So India should stop pointing fingers at other countries and care about its own nukes which are under great threat.

Muhammad Javed Iqbal Rakizar
Lahore

Opinion

Editorial

‘Cruel jest’
Updated 02 Jul, 2024

‘Cruel jest’

Actual economic course correction has once again been put off for another time.
Limited choices
02 Jul, 2024

Limited choices

NONE of the limited choices before the international community where dealing with the Afghan Taliban regime are very...
India’s victory
02 Jul, 2024

India’s victory

IN the end, the best team won — the team that held its nerve best when the stakes were the highest. Batting...
Resolution 901
Updated 01 Jul, 2024

Resolution 901

Our lawmakers’ failure to stand united in the face of foreign criticism may not have been unexpected but it was still disturbing to witness.
Nebulous definition
01 Jul, 2024

Nebulous definition

IS it a ‘vision’, a loose programme, or an actual kinetic ‘operation’? A week on, we don’t precisely know....
Stealing heritage
01 Jul, 2024

Stealing heritage

CONTRADICTIONS define Pakistan. While the country’s repository of antiquities can change its fortunes, recurrent...