NICK Clegg has hurriedly revised the Liberal Democrat post-election negotiating position by insisting that he had not ruled out a possible deal with Labour in a hung parliament. However, he said that if Labour came third in share of the vote — with polls suggesting that is a distinct possibility — he did not believe that Gordon Brown could remain as prime minister.

His clarification marks a shift from the weekend when he appeared to suggest Labour would have forfeited the right to govern if it came third on May 6. His remarks had alarmed some on the progressive Left who argued that he was in danger of reducing the anti-Tory tactical vote.

Labour and the Conservatives condemned Clegg on the issue on Monday. One cabinet minister said he was over-reaching himself and had become intoxicated with his own publicity, and the Tories said he was holding the country to ransom with his demands for electoral reform.

Clegg, however, has not been deterred from trying to set out the Lib Dem stance. He said “I think, if Labour do come third in terms of the number of votes cast, then people would find it inexplicable that Gordon Brown himself could carry on as prime minister. As for who I'd work with, I've been very clear — much clearer than David Cameron and Gordon Brown — that I will work with anyone. I will work with a man from the moon, I don't care, with anyone who can deliver the greater fairness that I think people want.”

Asked if he could work with the “man from the moon but not Gordon Brown”, he said “I just don't think the British people would accept that he could carry on as prime minister, which is what the convention of old politics dictates when, or rather if, he were to lose the election in such spectacular style.”

Lib Dem officials confirmed that Clegg was singling out Brown as the man the country would not tolerate if Labour dropped to third in share of the vote.

Clegg's new formula raises the problem of how Labour could replace Brown, as well as the prospect of Labour having a second prime minister who has not won a mandate at a general election. Of likely successors, Alan Johnson, Ed Balls and David Miliband could all lay claim to take over from Brown.

Three days before the final TV debate, Monday's polls showed there had been no crumbling of Lib Dem support, which surged after the first broadcast. A Guardian/ICM poll put the Tories on 33 per cent, the Lib Dems on 30 per cent and Labour on 28 per cent — the same as a week ago. A ComRes poll for ITN showed the Tories on 32 per cent, down two, the Lib Dems on 31, up two, and Labour on 28, unchanged. Both polls suggest Labour could end up with more seats than either of the other two parties.

On Monday, the campaign was again dominated by speculation over a hung parliament, with David Cameron claiming that Clegg was trying to hold the country to ransom by demanding electoral reform as a precondition for a coalition government. He reiterated that he was opposed to such a reform but without absolutely ruling out a referendum on the issue. It is possible Cameron could still offer Clegg a referendum on compromise reforms — somewhere between the status quo and the preferred Lib Dem option of the single transferable vote.

— The Guardian, London

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.