Lost and found

Published December 10, 2010

THE mystery of 11 men who had gone 'missing' from Rawalpindi's Adiyala jail in May after being acquitted on charges of terrorism has been solved — to an extent. The men's families had long held that they were in the custody of the intelligence agencies. This allegation turned out to be true on Thursday. The counsel representing Inter-Services Intelligence and Military Intelligence told the Supreme Court during the hearing of a petition against the disappearance that the men were indeed in the agencies' custody and had been 'recovered' from terror camps. He added that they would be tried for allegedly carrying out acts of terror. Only a few days earlier the attorney general had submitted a statement to the apex court on behalf of the agencies stating they did not have custody of the men. The statement perturbed the bench, mainly because it was not signed by the heads of the agencies, and the chief justice asked if these outfits were above the law.

The fact that the Supreme Court put enough pressure for the agencies to reveal the truth about the missing men is commendable. However, the matter should not end there and further explanation should be sought. Questions remain about how the men were picked up despite being acquitted by a trial court as well as about where they were kept. Few will be convinced by the 'terror camp' story. Also, the admission by the agencies raises a bigger question about the fate of other missing persons, such as Baloch nationalists and alleged jihadis. The families of these people have been protesting outside the apex court for several years now, ever since people started 'disappearing' on a large scale during the Musharraf era. The most important issue here is that everyone — guilty or not — has a right to a free and fair trial. That is a requirement for creating a just, democratic society. There is no argument over the fact that those who break the law and indulge in acts of terrorism should be tried and punished. But this must be done within the ambit of the law, not by circumventing it.

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.